AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Donna Budzynski

200200L201 · CHEM100 · CHEM152 · CHEN200 · CHEM251 · CHEM200L · CHEM201 · CHEM200 · 200AND201 · CHEM100L · 201L · CHEM200200L · 134 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
74.19%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

. Bud if you will practice packets and use office hours; if you need a low-effort easy A in chemistry.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture packets and study guidesDrops lowest quizzes and examsTest heavy chemOffice hours lifesaverExtra credit workshops
  • Organized packets, practice problems, and work
  • Grade depends heavily on quizzes and exams;
  • Labs are clearer and easier than lecture for many students

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A , and office hours, but and many say it is not an easy A.

Nearly all grade-effort evidence is in-person; the two online .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

General chemistry moves fast with conceptual depth; but content is still serious.

In-person dominates; online also calls the subject hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is often not mandatory because videos and packets exist, .

In-person mixed mandatory tags; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

About three in ; fans call her the best chem professor if you work, critics warn of .

Recommendation is strong in and lecture; online sample is tiny and split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Partial credit, drops, and help, but some call her a .

Format shift

and ; online has little grading-detail.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

, but , and self-study time make the load real.

Format shift

; lab reports are structured but more manageable.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

, and passion stand out for most; a minority say she is fast, boring, or unhelpful.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is abundant; online teaching quality is under-sampled.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Quizzes and exams drive the grade; points.

Format shift

Consistent across recent in-person CHEM200 comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person gen chem is structured with packets, weekly quizzes, multiple exams with , and strong office-hour support when students put in work.

Main concern

Fast pace and tough timed tests punish passive students; a minority report harsh or .

What students said

“Homework is optional! One quiz every week but but .”
CHEM200
“Put effort in and you'll get an A!”
CHEM200
“Most people complain that her class is too difficult.”
CHEM200

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one strong review praises concise videos and fair tests; and .

Main concern

Only two online reviews, so and support experience is not well proven.

What students said

“She gives you all the information you need to .”
CHEM200
“ and HomeWorks. ”
CHEM152

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams mirror packets and practice sets but are timed and difficult, with lowest scores often dropped.

Multiple exams with dropsWeekly quizzesPractice tests and packetsTimed testsTake-home quizzes sometimes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students face several exams and ; ; finals sometimes optional if grade is solid.

Lowest exam droppedQuiz dropsStudy guidesTimed hard exams
“There were 4 exams (lowest score dropped) and 13 quizzes (lowest 3 dropped).”
CHEM200
“The if you're happy with your grade. Most of the ”
CHEM200

Online

Online reviews say tests are hard but one praises straightforward wording; .

Difficult examsHomework plus exams
“they are also straightforward with no tricky wording hoping to trip you up.”
CHEM200
“ and HW doesn't actual help with overall grade.”
CHEM152

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“SO GENUINE! Really cares about students passing, is available and encourages questions all the time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 chemistry , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“She explains chemistry like she loves it, her analogies are spot on, and the so many resources for .”

⚖️ Effort For Reward

42/100

“Not an easy A.”

📝

78/100

“Your and tests.”

👍 Recommendation

74/100

“Take her class!”

Theme 1

📚 About Resources and Structure

  • Gives you lecture packets to go along with lectures.
  • DO THE PACKET PROBLEMS to prepare for quizzes.
  • She provides so many resources to do well

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Put effort in and you'll get an A!
  • Class is not easy, the concepts are not easy, the .
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • SO GENUINE! Really cares about students passing
  • and understanding.
  • she loves to help her students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

134

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with detailed assessment structure notes and a .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 596
4 out of 512
3 out of 511
2 out of 59
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CHEM20026 reviews
CHEM2015 reviews
CHEM200200L4 reviews
CHEM200L3 reviews
200200L2012 reviews
Show 7 more courses
CHEM1002 reviews
CHEM2512 reviews
CHEN2002 reviews
200AND2011 review
201L1 review
CHEM100L1 review
CHEM1521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

21

A+ 5 · A 16

B range

10

B+ 5 · B 5

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2