AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Katherine Belden-Hillery

MATH140 · MATH116 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the math and and peers.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoes Not TeachHomework HeavyPop QuizzesVague FeedbackHit or Miss
  • Most students say she assigns heavily but teaches little in class.
  • Frequent quizzes/exams and .
  • A minority report flexible projects, Canvas materials, and easy As.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

A few students earn As with and practice tests, but many say .

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content difficulty is mixed; the real pain is volume of work and .

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

and Canvas materials can cover absences.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

26/100

Five of seven reviews and heavy testing.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

and one wrong detail can fail an assignment; positives mainly note late HW accepted.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Repeated reports of lots of , and biweekly exams.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Dominant theme is little to no teaching in class and weak help when students ask questions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Quizzes every lecture and frequent exams dominate the .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person MATH116/140 feels assignment-heavy with limited lecturing and uneven support for struggling students.

Main concern

Weak in-class teaching plus frequent high-stakes quizzes can sink students who need guidance.

What students said

“she does not teach at all, she assigns so .”
MATH116
“I learned more from my classmates than I did from her”
MATH140
“ she gives you for review.”
MATH140

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and last-minute notice create a strict testing environment for most students.

Pop QuizzesFrequent ExamsPractice TestsLast-Minute Notices

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections feature quizzes , and mixed use of practice tests.

Pop QuizzesFrequent ExamsPractice Tests
“she has quizzes every lecture worth 100 points, exams every 2 weeks”
MATH116
“She tells us when the so we have no little time to study at all.”
MATH116
“the she gives you for review”
MATH140

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DO NOT Take this class, taking this class with this professor was the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching gaps and assessment load. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Gaps

28/100

“She never lectured so we .”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“she assigns so .”

👎 Recommendation

26/100

“ .”

🙂 Minority Positive

55/100

“I found the class pretty easy... ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she does not teach at all
  • answer your questions without fully answering them
  • sarcastic humor and casual approach

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • quizzes every lecture worth 100 points
  • getting one small detail wrong fails the whole assignment

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support

  • When you need help with
  • Went to six different tutors that did not know what to do
  • tell them to ask a classmate

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only 7 in-person reviews, but themes are detailed and mostly consistent; small sample limits confidence.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH1404 reviews
MATH1163 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1