AI Rate Professor

English

Joanna Mang

ENGLISH101 · ENG205 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENGL205 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Consider only if you want an easier English load and and uneven communication.

Best fit · Easy A HunterPolarizing English profEasy papers if you readLate grading complaintsStrong feedback when engagedPolitical reading agenda
  • Course content is usually easy with few papers and light exams for ENG101/205.
  • , and harsh or negligent demeanor.
  • Older , and easy As if you read and participate.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students say do the reading and papers and you get an A; .

Both formats call the class easy; online has one A- with poor support, in person has many A reports plus some B grades.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Light paper counts and non-rigorous lectures dominate; English majors sometimes find it too easy.

Consistent across online and in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

; many list mandatory and warn participation or skip-class risk.

In person often mandatory; online usually not required when reported.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Take-again near 67% masks a sharp split between older fans and .

Online mixed (easy credit vs awful support); in person strongly polarized by era.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

54/100

Historically not a tough grader, but and .

Format shift

Online once called a ; .

Workload

Light

72/100

, and little or no heavy testing.

Format shift

Online can be one light task a week; .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Engaging when on, but complaints of closed-mindedness, unpreparedness, and negligence pull the score down.

Format shift

Older in-person praise is high; recent online and in-person reviews are much colder.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and occasional final rather than frequent exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize essays and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Historically easy and engaging for many; recent and a strong political agenda.

Main concern

and perceived bias make the easy workload less attractive.

What students said

“Her class is easy, but her demeanor is negligent and incredibly harsh.”
ENG205
“ and a ”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Easy credit for some with light weekly work, but and weak English focus.

Main concern

Unresponsive communication and .

What students said

“The class itself was very easy; however, if there is any sort of confusion with an assignment and you would like to reach her, good luck with that.”
ENGL205
“online class had one easy and . only 2 essays in the whole semester.”
ENG205

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is paper- and .

Few papersOccasional finalReading responsesNo heavy testing

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Usually 2–4 papers and sometimes a final; success tied to reading and .

Two to four papersOccasional finalReading based
“She never gives you test except for the but you do ”
ENG101
“Lot's of reading but only 2 essays for such a high level course.”
ENG205

Online

Light weekly assignments and only a couple essays; .

Weekly easy assignmentsFew essays
“online class had one easy and . only 2 essays in the whole semester.”
ENG205

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class itself was very easy; however, if there is any sort of confusion with an assignment and you would like to reach her, good luck with that.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews (4 online, 27 in person), highlighting and polarization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She is amazing. Probably one of . She will make you enjoy taking english!”

⏱️

30/100

“She .”

📗 Easy Content

84/100

“Good professor and easy class. and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Funny and sarcastic when engaged
  • Interesting lectures and discussions
  • Some call her pretentious or closed-minded

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy A if you read and
  • Only a
  • Recent tough and

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication and Bias

  • Email and access outside class can be poor
  • Political agenda complaints appear
  • Some grades shift after class ends

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

31 reviews across many years with , and repeated late-grading themes.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 58
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENGL1019 reviews
ENG1018 reviews
ENG2058 reviews
ENGLISH1013 reviews
ENGL2052 reviews
Show 1 more courses
1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 2 · A 12 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1