AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Corinna Guenther

ANTHR101 · ANTH101 · ANTHRO102 · ANTH103 · ANTH102 · ANTH104 · ANTH7887 · 50 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
46.15%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will read heavily and use every extra-credit option; otherwise pick another anthropology professor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing anthropologyTons of extra creditHeavy reading loadTough or unclear gradingPassionate but disorganized
  • many call her wonderful and fair, many say find another professor.
  • is abundant and can rescue grades when you keep up.
  • Complaints cluster on , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

can push grades up, but tough grading, timed tests, and .

Online summer and short terms feel especially hard; in-person lab ANTH104 is often more forgiving with EC.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

, and fast survey content make the course intellectually and time-demanding.

; and last-minute posts.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and optional across terms and courses.

Several online and ; labs and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

Near half would-take-again with strong love and and expectations.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Many call her a tough grader with ; EC helps but .

Format shift

; online and lecture survey courses draw more tough-grader tags.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and last-minute adds create a heavy load.

Format shift

Online summer sessions are repeatedly called excessive; even 1-unit lab can feel like a full class.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Passionate and knowledgeable for supporters, but often criticized as meandering, late, or .

Format shift

and culture courses trend higher; online survey sections trend lower.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Midterms, finals, timed quizzes, and pop quizzes carry heavy weight; projects matter but .

Format shift

In person often test-heavy; and discussions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person is warmer for many lab and lecture students who like passion and EC, but , and .

Main concern

Test-heavy weighting and .

What students said

“Honestly a super chill prof. Very approachable and will answer any question you have. Offers PLENTY of ”
ANTH104
“Do not waste your time with this professor. She grades hard for a survey Anthropology class and .”
ANTH102
“ galore! If you want an A you can get it.”
ANTH102

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are often harsh , and cheating accusations, with some strong positive exceptions.

Main concern

Late materials, excessive workload, and .

What students said

“Posted everything late with not enough time to complete, loads of and .”
ANTH101
“Even for a 4 week class the work was very excessive, and she accused every one of cheating even those who didn't.”
ANTH102
“Great professor!! Taught the class well, provided amazing information, and the class layout was easy to follow.”
ANTH102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Many report hard timed tests and ; friendliness depends heavily on using .

Timed testsTest heavyQuestions from lectures not only bookPop quizzesExtra credit offset

Assessment risk

Strict

36/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals can dominate the grade; some find finals hard while others .

Test heavy weightingQuizzes every other weekDifficult final for someEC can bump grade
“She doesn't use a , so and final are literally worth 2/3rds of your grade.”
ANTH102
“ if you pay attention to lectures.”
ANTH101

Online

Online tests are often timed tightly with questions students say do not match book sources; late materials hurt prep.

Timed quizzes and testsHard questionsLate assignment postsCheating accusations reported
“Quizzes and and the time limit given was not proportionate to questions.”
ANTH102
“ answer questions. A minute or less per question.”
ANTH102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If this isn't your major, do not take her class and find another professor. Its passable due to lots of if and the test answers aren't related to the book but lectures instead”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 polarized anthropology reviews across online and in-person formats. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Professor Guenther is wonderful! She really wants to help you learn.”

⚠️ Polarized Recommendation

46/100

“0/10 find another teacher”

📚 Workload Intensity

28/100

“Way too many assignments, not all of .”

🎁 Lifeline

70/100

“ galore! If you want an A you can get it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She really wants to help you learn.
  • Her love for Anthropology was honestly inspiring
  • She sometimes gets off track from the syllabus or makes mistakes

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She grades hard for a survey Anthropology class
  • Offers PLENTY of in case you miss a
  • THIS IS ONLY A ONE UNIT CLASS!!

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • Posted everything late with not enough time to complete
  • she accused every one of cheating even those who didn't
  • Tons of reading and grades everything late.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

50

Lifetime ratings

87/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over a long span with a stable polarized pattern, rich detail, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 59
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ANTH10219 reviews
ANTH10315 reviews
ANTH1017 reviews
ANTH1045 reviews
ANTHRO1022 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ANTH78871 review
ANTHR1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

12

A 12

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 2

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1