AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Gina Abbiate

MATH255 · MATH141 · MATH254 · MATH045 · MATH116 · MATH150 · MATH151 · MATH210 · MATH104 · 182 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Solid pick for calc/precalc if you attend, study classwork for quizzes, and can handle a sometimes blunt style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but mixed toneWeekly quizzesClear grading criteriaLecture-heavy mathQuiz retakes
  • Many students earn As , and partial credit when they stay consistent.
  • caring and .
  • Structure is usually lecture plus quizzes and a sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many As come from weekly quizzes, classwork-aligned tests, partial credit, and .

Online students emphasize homework volume; and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content ranges from doable precalc to fast-paced calc/linear algebra that still rewards steady practice.

In-person higher-level math feels harder; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

and stress showing up for quizzes, classwork, and participation.

A minority of sections report optional attendance, but .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Roughly three-quarters would take again, with strong praise for structure offset by repeated complaints about tone.

Recommendation is stronger when .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Students often , and clear criteria despite occasional tough-grader tags.

Format shift

Online comments stress partial credit on solutions; in person more often mentions and .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Weekly quizzes and practice dominate; and heavy in others online.

Format shift

Online MATH116 reports lots of homework; .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Many call lectures amazing and caring, while a .

Format shift

Polarization is mostly an in-person story; online reviews are fewer but generally positive on support resources.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grade usually mixes weekly quizzes with a .

Format shift

Some online precalc runs quiz-only with notes allowed; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person is lecture and classwork heavy with , and polar reactions to her classroom tone.

Main concern

and report dismissive or passive-aggressive answers to questions.

What students said

“I would not say this class is easy but she made it easier to achieve an A in the class.”
MATH151
“You will spend most of your time teaching yourself, as lectures consist of her writing on the board with .”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online , and weekly posts or filmed problem solutions while still feeling caring.

Main concern

Easy to fall behind if you procrastinate on the .

What students said

“There is a lot of homework. She does give you notes and video .”
MATH116
“No exams, just 5 quizzes online that you can use notes and other software like Desmos.”
MATH141

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes generally track classwork and announced topics, with .

Weekly quizzesFew major examsClasswork-based testsSome quiz retakesOptional final in some sections

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person courses typically use weekly quizzes plus two to three exams, sometimes with .

Weekly quizzes3 exams commonOptional final replaces examStudy from classwork
“The grade is based on 3 exams (not too difficult) and .”
MATH151
“ . 2 tests plus final.”
MATH150

Online

and homework rather than strict proctored finals.

Online quizzesNotes allowedHomework heavy
“No exams, just 5 quizzes online that you can use notes and other software like Desmos.”
MATH141

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I would not say this class is easy but she made it easier to achieve an A in the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, balancing glowing and critical math-course experiences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Professor Gina made calc 2 very doable.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“Gina is one of the .”

⚖️

70/100

“She's also a .”

📝 Quiz-Driven Course

58/100

“There is weekly quizzes, but they're not too bad and motivate you to learn the topics before the exams.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • super easy to understand
  • lectures consist of her writing on the board with
  • Great lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Really easy to keep a high grade in her class as long as you do the assignments
  • so just study it and you will get an A
  • Class is pretty easy as long as u pay attention to lectures and do the hw

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • genuinely wants you to learn the material
  • she can be very condescending and degrading when you have questions
  • She got you!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

182

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews across many math courses and years, with consistent structure themes despite split personality opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5132
4 out of 521
3 out of 513
2 out of 54
1 out of 513

Course coverage

MATH15017 reviews
MATH14115 reviews
MATH1047 reviews
MATH1516 reviews
MATH0451 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH1161 review
MATH2101 review
MATH2541 review
MATH2551 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

48 reported outcomes

A range

33

A+ 5 · A 24 · A- 4

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

3

C 3

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1