AI Rate Professor

English

Mariam Kushkaki

ENG205 · ENGLISH205 · ENGL105 · ENG210 · ENG101 · ENGL205 · ENG202 · 59 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
88.33%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Take her for ENG writing or linguistics if , and a supportive classroom.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHilariousCaring MentorProject BasedGreat FeedbackNo Textbook
  • Students repeatedly call her one of the , and .
  • as resumes and statements, rarely textbooks.
  • A few students report , but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students who turn in projects on time, use drafting weeks, and .

Both formats report manageable paths to A; a minority of .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

and practical rather than abstract theory, though writing volume and .

In-person students stress interactive lectures; online students emphasize project load more than content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

, yet drafting weeks and some online sections make presence more flexible.

In-person reviews more often say attendance is mandatory; several .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

The because she is funny, caring, and practically helpful.

In-person recommendations are near-unanimous; online has a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

, and detailed feedback help most students score well, with only a .

Format shift

; a few online reviews describe unclear rubrics and .

Workload

Light

66/100

Usually a handful of , though 8-week terms feel busier.

Format shift

Both formats are project-based; online short terms and honors add-ons increase load for some.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students consistently praise engaging lectures, humor, empathy, organization, and career-relevant writing instruction.

Format shift

; online still earns many best-professor comments when communication is clear.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and statements with limited traditional high-stakes testing.

Format shift

Across formats, projects dominate; a few classes mention tests only as accommodations context.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and community-like with drafting weeks, jokes, and practical projects.

Main concern

Attendance and participation often matter, and a few found the tone juvenile or unprofessional.

What students said

“She's absolutely hilarious and gives really good information.”
ENG202
“Lots of jokes and learning, felt like a nice community.”
ENG205
“She is able to make English a very tangible and straightforward.”
ENG205

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections are often async or chill with and , though a few report harsh rubrics or unclear organization.

Main concern

and announcement-based assignment posting can stress organization-dependent students.

What students said

“She's one of the lot since I took her asynchronous course.”
ENG205
“ . .”
ENG205
“There's , and a manageable workload.”
ENGL205

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment and drafting time rather than strict proctored exams.

Project BasedDrafting WeeksFew Traditional ExamsPractical Writing

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

time, and practical papers; exams are rarely the main stressor.

Drafting WeeksLibrary Work SessionsProject Based
“only 4 main projects and we had drafting weeks before the , so class was optional.”
ENG205
“Prof. assigned an essay on Monday&the and let us work on our paper.”
ENG205

Online

Online reviews focus on projects and requirements mentioned.

Project BasedExtra CreditNo Proctoring Mentioned
“There are a total of 4 projects which were super fun and easy to work on.”
ENG205
“The class was a few exams and a project. The but she's an so it was fine.”
ENG202

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I can't find a single reason behind those few negative comments, she deserves nothing but 5/5”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews across online and , and workload themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“For such a young teacher she has a very captivating lecture style that engages the whole class and gets everyone involved.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“Take her class!”

📝

88/100

“ and ”

😄 Classroom Energy

90/100

“She's absolutely hilarious and gives really good information.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Makes linguistics fun and and real-world applications.
  • she utilizes the
  • She makes writing fun and uses relevant texts.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Amazing teacher and .
  • .
  • Class felt way too much like a high school english class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she is a resource we can use for life
  • She's mean and strict.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

59

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with high consistency, multi-year span, rich detail, and both formats strongly support the positive picture.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 550
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG20525 reviews
ENGL20511 reviews
ENG2027 reviews
ENG1013 reviews
ENG2102 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENGL1051 review
ENGLISH2051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

34

A+ 12 · A 19 · A- 3

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1