AI Rate Professor

English

Rosanna Walker

ENG116 · ENG205 · ENG115 · ENGL105 · ENGL210 · ENG105 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENGL205 · ENGL211 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
76.92%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take Walker if and self-driven online; expect light structure risk and do .

Best fit · Effort For RewardInteresting free readingsClear criteria when responsiveSlow grading riskEssay-focused EnglishOnline often more flexible
  • Many students like Walker's thought-provoking readings, free materials, and fair path if you complete weekly work.
  • The biggest recurring pain , and weak communication for some terms.
  • Online sections can be very manageable with few major essays; and smaller.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Doing weekly discussions and essays usually works, but and .

Online comments more often say easy if you keep up; and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

60/100

Readings and prompts are interesting rather than abstract, yet English essay standards still require real work.

and writing; intersession online can feel simple if paced well.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

, while several in-person classes require it and prize participation.

Online is more flexible; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

About 77% would take again, with warm praise for inspiration and care offset by communication and .

and ; in-person sample is smaller and split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Discussions and routine work are often lenient, while and criteria scrutiny.

Format shift

Online students report both easy early grading and pickier later essays; .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Usually a and discussions rather than endless busywork.

Format shift

Online intersessions can be light; some terms .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

When communication , and personal; when it fails she feels distant and disorganized.

Format shift

Online quality is more polarized; in-person has both love and severe frustration reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and reading responses rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

True across formats; research project.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews range from fun personal discussion-heavy classes to and .

Main concern

Some students report and poor communication.

What students said

“This class is personal and fun. I love this teacher”
ENG115
“She's always !”
ENG205
“Didn't grade anything until the last week of the semester. .”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online English is often called manageable with , and a couple essays, though and communication misses appear in several reviews.

Main concern

, and limited teaching contact in async formats.

What students said

“This class was super easy if you just do your work every week.”
ENG101
“Clear expectations for work, work was straightforward and fun, and and responded promptly.”
ENGL101
“Syllabus was not posted until last week of class despite me emailing her the second day.”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Courses run mainly on papers and participation; reviews do not clearly prove webcam or Lockdown-style exams.

Essay basedDiscussion and peer reviewFew timed exams describedNo clear proctoring evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person emphasizes discussion, participation, essays, and occasional essay tests or .

Class discussion heavyEssays and research projectEssay tests in lit courses
“Essay tests and a research project.”
ENGL211
“ and two short submissions and one peer review.”
ENG205

Online

Online work is discussions, responses, and a small number of essays; .

Weekly discussionsTwo to three major essaysPeer review sometimesAsync structure
“Every week is a couple cool articles to read about and then a week.”
ENG101
“There was 2 essays and 4 response questions and maybe 2 discussion boards.”
ENGL205

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class was super easy if you just do your work every week.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews with and mixed consistency. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚

70/100

“She gives all the reading material so you won't have to spend a penny on textbooks.”

⏱️ and Communication Risk

35/100

“She . She takes so long to send back my emails.”

👍

72/100

“If you put effort into the class and complete the work you will get a good grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dr. Walker is the only professor I have ever had who made an online class just as personal as one in a classroom.
  • she is so inspiring. She cares about you.
  • She doesn't teach (I had her asynchronous)

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She's not the but for all the rest of the activities in the semester shes VERY lenient.
  • She goes hard on the .
  • Just do your work with effort.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • Syllabus was not posted until last week of class
  • Didn't grade anything until the last week of the semester.
  • She .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-six reviews give a usable but thinner signal with polarized communication experiences and .

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 57
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1019 reviews
ENGL2055 reviews
ENG2053 reviews
ENGL1013 reviews
ENG1051 review
Show 5 more courses
ENG1151 review
ENG1161 review
ENGL1051 review
ENGL2101 review
ENGL2111 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

9

B+ 5 · B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 2