AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Robert Wong

ARCH220 · ARCH100 · ARCH101 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want a and you are ready to show up, ask early, and meet a perfectionist standard.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and hands-onTough perfectionist graderAmazing practical lecturesMandatory attendanceProject-heavy drafting
  • Students praise his care, one-on-one help, and real-world architecture experience.
  • and , so expectations must be learned early.
  • and sequential projects punish falling behind.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many students earn As with steady project work, but tough perfectionist grading and .

Both online and in-person students report As with effort; the tough-grader concern is strongest in in-person ARCH100 comments.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Intro drafting and Archicad content is practical and manageable when you stay current, not abstract theory-heavy.

Online and in-person both describe manageable, sequential project work rather than extreme conceptual difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and warn that skipping class makes it hard to pass.

In-person and ; one very old review called attendance lenient if work was done.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

and praise how much they learn from a caring, hands-on architecture teacher.

Recommendation is strong in both formats, with only a few older or mixed in-person critiques.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Students often get As, but multiple reviews call him a and few improvement comments.

Format shift

; online reviews focus more on clarity and help.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Projects are sequential and , but many say the load is manageable with .

Format shift

Online students stress not falling behind week to week; in-person students describe practical but doable drafting work.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

, and inspiring, though a minority dislike his tone or .

Format shift

; in-person reviews emphasize care and hands-on help.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

and sequential assignments more than high-stakes sit-down exams.

Format shift

Both formats describe project-driven work; quizzes appear occasionally but are not the main story.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and strong on drafting essentials, with repeated notes that he grades tough and expects perfection.

Main concern

if criteria are unclear until late.

What students said

“He genuinely cares about his students and allows class time to complete assignments.”
ARCH101
“he's pretty unforgiving with grading.”
ARCH100
“He is a Perfectionist so be aware, pretty good teacher overall”
ARCH100

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online ARCH101 students , and willing to allow Zoom recording, though classes ran long and asking questions early mattered.

Main concern

Long lectures and if you do not keep up weekly.

What students said

“ to ask questions!!!”
ARCH101
“He gives a lot of help and tutoring though! Make sure you voice any questions or confusion early on”
ARCH101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; reviews do not clearly prove open-book or strict proctored finals.

Project-based assessmentOccasional quizzesNo clear proctoring details

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and occasional quizzes more than formal exam policy.

Assignment gradingQuizzes mentioned
“if you stay on top of the projects. quizes,show up to class- you'll be fine.”
ARCH100

Online

Online comments focus on sequential projects and .

Sequential projectsZoom lecture recording
“ so make sure you have everything done before the next class”
ARCH101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I loved taking Archicad with professor Wong. He genuinely cares about his students and allows class time to complete assignments.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews spanning 2005-2026, blending online and . Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Student Care

88/100

“He is an . Whenever you have a problem, he's always willing to help and find a solution.”

📐

48/100

“he's pretty unforgiving with grading.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Robert Wong is an excellent professor; he cares so much about his class that he rewrites the book every semester.”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“he's been my favorite teacher within the architecture program thus far.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • He made class a joy.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • He is a Perfectionist so be aware
  • pretty unforgiving with grading
  • The course was well-paced, the work was manageable

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • genuinely cares about his students
  • very enthusiastic about helping his students out
  • very personable

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews span many years with consistent praise for care and teaching, but grade detail and recent sample size are uneven.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARCH1007 reviews
ARCH2204 reviews
ARCH1013 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 5

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values