AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Morteza Mohssenzadeh

ENG200 · ENGE200 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid if you have another statics option; if and tutoring every week.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoes not teachSelf-taught staticsReads PowerPointsTough graderTest heavy
  • Most students and they learn from the book, YouTube, or tutors.
  • Homework and tests are heavy while partial credit is limited.
  • A and fair, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and strong problem practice, and several students say grading expects near perfection with little partial credit.

Both online and and self-teaching; no easy-A evidence appears.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Statics content plus weak lectures makes the course feel hard even when the material itself is standard engineering.

Difficulty complaints are consistent across online and in-person ENGE200 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

while others do not, but several students still say class adds little teaching value.

; online also shows mixed mandatory vs optional notes.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most reviewers say not to waste time with him and that peer mentors or tutors teach the class instead.

Negative recommendation dominates both formats, with only a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tags and comments repeatedly call him a credit.

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of , and test-heavy structure leave little room to coast.

Format shift

Homework and .

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Dominant theme is that he reads slides, rambles, and does not work examples, so students teach themselves.

Format shift

Online and ; a few older in-person reviews are more positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

as practice, not the main learning channel from the professor.

Format shift

and in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews repeatedly say he does not teach, rambles, and and the textbook.

Main concern

Useless lectures plus tough, perfection-oriented testing.

What students said

“You will be teaching yourself this class. His lectures are pointless and are a waster of time”
ENGE200
“There is no teaching style to critique here, he does not teach.”
ENGE200
“The class is completely self taught, dont expect to learn anything unless you read each chapter and attend tutoring.”
ENG200

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe Zoom PPT lectures with , and heavy reliance on book and peer mentors.

Main concern

No real teaching in lecture and weak instructor support outside class.

What students said

“ ! Do not waste your time with this guy.”
ENGE200
“lectures are just him talking as he plays a ppt in Zoom. No whiteboard writing.”
ENGE200

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes drive the course and are described as picky, with limited partial credit and no student-friendly proctoring details given.

Test heavyPerfection gradingLittle partial creditSelf-study required

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and partial credit has little value, so perfection is expected.

Test heavyLittle partial creditBook practice required
“Don't rely on partial credit it has little value, you are graded on perfection”
ENGE200
“just make sure to do all the practice problems in the book and actually read the chapter.”
ENGE200

Online

Online reviews emphasize graded-by-few-things toughness but do not clearly describe webcam or Lockdown Browser rules.

Tough graderGraded by few things
“ ! Do not waste your time with this guy.”
ENGE200

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There is no teaching style to critique here, he does not teach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews with strong consistency on weak lectures and self-teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

16/100

“Doesn't teach. He will read you the and will never work through an example problem on a white board.”

📚 Self Taught Course

20/100

“The class is completely self taught, dont expect to learn anything unless you read each chapter and attend tutoring.”

⚖️

22/100

“Don't rely on partial credit it has little value, you are graded on perfection”

👎 Recommendation

24/100

“ ! Do not waste your time with this guy.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are horrible
  • lectures are just him talking as he plays a ppt in Zoom
  • he really doesn't teach much and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • Test heavy
  • you are graded on perfection

Theme 3

⚠️ About Professionalism

  • talks bad about individual students and classes
  • waste all your time on his failed career instead of teaching
  • often gets sidetracked by boasting about his sick leave

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews are consistently negative on teaching quality across several years, though sample size is modest and a few outliers disagree.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENGE2009 reviews
ENG2001 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2