AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Erin Evans

SOC110 · SOCO110 · SOCO101 · SOC101 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
64.52%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Prefer her in person if you will read and participate; online students needing accommodations should be cautious.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate sociologistTough graderReading heavyPolarized onlineExtra credit available
  • , and a clear path to an A with participation.
  • Online reviews are sharply split, with and DSPS accommodation complaints.
  • Expect and conceptual exams; effort is required and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Many A earners exist, but , participation, and strict rubric following.

; in-person students more often describe a fair path to an A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is readable sociology with long chapters and .

; online adds more complaints about unclear structure.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

In-person often marks attendance mandatory and participation-weighted; .

Online ; in-person rewards showing up.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

About two-thirds would take again overall, but online accommodation and .

record.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

and comments about failing work despite following rubrics lower leniency.

Format shift

Strictness appears more often in online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Lots of reading, discussion posts, quizzes, essays, and occasional group work make the load substantial.

Format shift

Both formats mention reading; .

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Strong praise for passion, humor, and and support complaints.

Format shift

Teaching praise is stronger in person; online quality scores are more polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of readings, discussions, midterms, finals, essays, and sometimes contract or .

Format shift

and finals; in-person stresses participation and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews largely praise passionate lectures, caring support, participation, and attainable As when students read and engage.

Main concern

Still a ; a few found the .

What students said

“Professor Evans literally sets you up to get an A. Her lectures are amazing, and funny”
SOC101
“Erin was amazing and engaging, she cares about her students but ”
SOC110

Remote format

Online

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some love clear modules, lectures, and , while many report nitpicky , and accommodation failures.

Main concern

Tough/nitpicky grading, locked grade views, accommodation issues, and .

What students said

“ so specific that it was confusing”
SOCO110
“She does not follow disability accommodations.”
SOC110
“She is hella funny and will give work.”
SOCO110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams often require precise reading knowledge; some formats include essays and .

Reading-based testsMidterm essayMultiple choice plus essayUnclear wording reportedExtra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person midterms described as easy multiple choice plus essay; .

Multiple choice plus essayAttendance-linked final opportunities
“ and essay potion, and final exam: A if !!”
SOCO110

Online

Online students report specific quiz/test wording, midterm essays, finals focused on readings, and .

Reading-based testsMidterm essayNitpicky quiz wording
“ so specific that ”
SOCO110
“She had a and a final exam which only focused on single parts of readings.”
SOCO110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Evans literally sets you up to get an A. Her lectures are amazing, and funny, and always encourages class participation.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, comparing online polarization with . Credibility rating: High.

🔥 Passion & Lectures

75/100

“One of the best and passionate teachers I have come across especially with the subject they are teaching!”

⚖️

35/100

“Even if you follow the rubrics to a T she will fail you”

♿ Accommodation Risk

25/100

“Doesn't follow DSPS accommodations AT ALL! Even if told repeatedly.”

👍 In-Person Recommendation

80/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is hella funny and will give work
  • makes lectures interesting
  • She's relatable and funny but also very informative

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but after I bombed a
  • You will need to work for your grade, but the course is very rewarding

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • the overall grade locked so I couldn't see my own progress
  • She does not follow disability accommodations
  • Everything is laid out super clearly and there's ongoing

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

31 detailed reviews across formats with consistent polarization patterns and multi-year span support medium-high confidence.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

SOCO11011 reviews
SOC1019 reviews
SOC1107 reviews
SOCO1014 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 5 · A 13

B range

7

B 6 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1