AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Hamidreza Bahraseman

ENGE210 · ENGE116ANDENGE2 · ENGE250 · ENGE116AND210 · ENGR100 · ENGE116 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
62.16%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you do the homework and use office hours, but expect uneven lecture quality and a heavier engineering workload.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHomework-aligned testsCaring when engagedAccent and lecture pace issuesExtra credit availableMixed online vs in-person
  • online complaints.
  • and solid grades.
  • Accent, PowerPoint-reading, and self-teaching still show up as recurring risks.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many As appear, but success and matching tests to that work rather than coasting.

; in-person reviews more often say homework plus class yields an A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Engineering topics like dynamics and MATLAB stay moderately hard .

Both formats call content real engineering work; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

, though frequent lateness can annoy him and some sections mark it yes.

Evidence is similar across formats; several in-person and online comments explicitly .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

About six in semesters and sharp older online complaints.

In-person recent reviews lean positive; older .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Curves, , and , though a few call him tough or unfair.

Format shift

Online has both generously graded exams and ; in-person leans more forgiving.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

and can be long or tedious, especially on Mastering Engineering.

Format shift

Online mentions long Pearson homework more; .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Caring and , but , and uneven engagement.

Format shift

In-person recent teaching praise is .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and finals, with tests often mirroring homework.

Format shift

Both formats center homework-plus-exams; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

on late work, and fair if you follow homework and review sessions.

Main concern

Some still say lectures are dull, accent-heavy, or that and is hard to reach.

What students said

“Professor Hamid is quite amazing to be quite honest. He is very forgiving if you miss an , and was very open for questions.”
ENGE210
“Prof hamid is the nicest and most caring professor.”
ENGE116
“ at all) I have had ever had.”
ENGE210

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and , while many call lectures pre-recorded PowerPoints and self-taught Mastering Engineering work.

Main concern

, and finals that can feel disconnected from homework.

What students said

“All of the and .”
ENGE210
“ !”
ENGE250
“Absolute legend. Show up to class and do the problems. Profit.”
ENGE116

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and , though difficulty and fairness still vary by term.

Homework-based testsTake-home exams (some online)Open exams mentionedOnline exams except final (some sections)Curves

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some older notes say most exams online except the final.

Tests similar to homeworkReview sessions helpOnline exams except final (reported)
“The if you pay attention to the homework and remember important formulas.”
ENGE210
“ !”
ENGE116andENGE2

Online

Online students report , and Mastering-style homework feeding exams, with .

Take-home testsCurvesMastering Engineering homework
“All of the and .”
ENGE210
“Open exams, but even that will barely help since he doesn't teach!”
ENGE250

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do the homework and you will get a good grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews across online and complaints. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“He is good at explaining the material and is, in general, a good lecturer.”

👍 Recommendation Split

62/100

“Professor Hamid is quite amazing to be quite honest.”

📚

68/100

“The so as long as you understand the .”

⚠️

35/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are great and he .
  • He doesnt teach well.
  • , if you were in class after the lecture you no need to read a book.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's a hard class but he is there for his students.
  • Homeworks are hard, extremely long, and sometimes tedious.
  • I learned nothing from him but got an esay A.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He is very forgiving if you miss an .
  • He is the nicest and most caring professor.
  • He has very nasty attitude.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

37 reviews span 2019-2025 with detailed mixed opinions and solid grade data, so the blended picture is reliable.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ENGE21013 reviews
ENGE25013 reviews
ENGE1167 reviews
ENGE116AND2102 reviews
ENGE116andENGE21 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGR1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 5 · A 18

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2