AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Gregorio Pantoja

CS141 · CHIC141A · CHIC141B · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
5%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Run away from his current online ethnic studies sections unless you have no alternative and can self-manage brutal short deadlines.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsive onlineUnclear instructionsHarsh discussion gradingUnreasonable due datesAvoid if possible
  • Almost all recent online reviews are 1-star avoid warnings.
  • Students , and .
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Some still finish with A/B after dean intervention or grinding papers, but and effort often feels wasted.

Online dominates with harsh discussion deductions; the if you attended.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Word-count discussions, dense readings, and than typical GE ethnic studies.

Challenge is almost entirely from online evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

70/100

; the pain is deadlines and group posts, not seat time.

; in-person sample is too thin to change the picture.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Would-take-again is near zero in practice, with and counselor or dean escalations.

Online is a ; one 2016 in-person review recommended him.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students report and partner non-participation.

Format shift

Harsh grading evidence is online; and easy quizzes.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

2000-word group discussions, short unlock windows, and .

Format shift

Workload pain is documented online; in-person workload detail is minimal.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Recent students say he does , and blames learners for layout chaos.

Format shift

Online teaching quality is awful; and passionate.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Grade , and papers rather than classic exams.

Format shift

Online is discussion/paper heavy; and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and one terse bad-joke complaint.

Main concern

; the sole strong positive is from 2016.

What students said

“Professor is truly passionate about what he is teaching and .”
CHIC141A
“A bad joke!”
CS141

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online experience is overwhelmingly negative: passive-aggressive tone, unclear boards, and .

Main concern

Zero communication plus harsh deductions for and group partners.

What students said

“ .”
CHIC141A
“Never .”
CHIC141B
“ if you need the credits and he's the only professor left, wait for next semester and find someone more competent.”
CHIC141B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews barely describe traditional exams and instead .

Discussion-board heavyGroup writingUnclear instructionsFew classic exams mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

One older in-person review says attending lectures makes tests and .

Lecture-based testsQuizzesExtra credit
“If and quizzes are easy and he offered at the end of the semester.”
CHIC141A

Online

Online assessments are mainly huge timed discussions and group write-ups; .

1000-2000 word discussions24-hour windowsGroup point penalties
“They make due dates for 1000 word discussions within 24 hours of opening.”
CHIC141A
“He creates confusing, convoluted 2000 word group discussions with .”
CHIC141B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you need the credits and he's the only professor left, wait for next semester and find someone more competent. Trust me.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, nearly all recent online CHIC/CS courses with . Credibility rating: High.

🚫

8/100

“ .”

📵 No Communication

10/100

“Horrible. Absolutely no communication the whole year. ”

📝 Harsh Discussions

12/100

“Deducted half points on your 100 point discussion for any reason.”

🕰️ Unreasonable Deadlines

15/100

“Coursework is heavy and is due within 12 hours of being unlocked.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor neglects teaching (literally )
  • Very passive aggressive in all aspects of communication.
  • Professor is truly passionate about what he is teaching and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • boards.
  • Dean forced him to give us A's after complaints
  • requires a lot of detail and critical thought for small articles and is a .

Theme 3

💔 About Student Experience

  • online or in person.
  • I would not want any student to experience
  • Take this class if you hate yourself, otherwise, don't.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

20 reviews with extremely consistent recent online 1-star themes and multiple detailed complaints make the negative picture highly .

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 518

Course coverage

CHIC141A9 reviews
CHIC141B8 reviews
CS1413 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2