AI Rate Professor

Biology

Miranda Mitchem

BIS205 · BIO210 · BIO100 · BIO205 · PHYS220 · BIO107 · BIOL107 · BIOL210 · COS126 · BIO111 · BIO211 · BIO101 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
34.48%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid if ; only self-driven students who can master dense material alone should risk this class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized LecturesTests Mismatch MaterialTest HeavyReads PowerPointsPolarizing Difficulty
  • Majority of students say lectures are unfocused and .
  • and frequent low class averages reported.
  • A minority say she cares and ; most still advise avoiding her.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

24/100

Even strong students describe difficult, high-stakes exams and say an A requires intense outside work with little lecture support.

Almost all grade and ease evidence is in-person; the single online review reports a C.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

18/100

Average difficulty is very high, with repeated claims of , and low class averages.

; online sample is one course only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance is repeatedly mandatory, with lockouts for lateness and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

and many reviews explicitly say do not take her despite a smaller group of defenders.

; the online review also would not take her again.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and harsh tests dominate, though a few students call her personally kind or occasionally flexible.

Format shift

In-person evidence is dominant; .

Workload

Moderate

44/100

Homework is often light, but , and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Most students describe reading slides, unclear answers, disorganization, and defensive responses to questions.

Format shift

In-person critiques are extensive; the one online comment is thin but not positive on teaching clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

Grades are overwhelmingly exam-driven with and occasional papers or labs.

Format shift

Consistent across in-person courses; online also notes graded by few things.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person bio and related science classes are widely criticized for disorganization, slide reading, and .

Main concern

, and strict attendance with weak instructional support.

What students said

“ , and study guides were pointless.”
BIO101
“Run and don't walk away from her.”
BIOL210
“She may have a PhD and think she a hot shot but as a professor she is just horrible.”
BIO205

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online review is sparse, notes heavy talking and .

Main concern

Too little online evidence; the one review is not a strong endorsement.

What students said

“Talks alot with out ever stopping”
COS126

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent, high weight, and widely described as poorly aligned with lectures or study guides.

Test HeavyLecture-Exam MismatchTricky QuestionsStudy Guides Often UselessHigh Stakes

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

lectures, and responsible for low class averages.

Test HeavyMismatch to LecturesStudy Guides UnreliableEssay and Detail Questions
“ , and study guides were pointless.”
BIO101
“You can get 100% on a quiz and then fail the exam because the inconsistency between her lecture covered material and what she asks on the exam.”
BIO210
“Our whole class avg never went above 60%”
BIO101

Online

The single online review does not clearly describe exam .

Tough GraderGraded by Few Things
“Talks alot with out ever stopping”
COS126

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . and unprofessional.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews (28 in-person, 1 online), emphasizing repeated exam-mismatch and disorganization themes with minority positive outliers. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Breakdown

30/100

“Lectures were very extensive and confusing. She just read the powerpoint.”

📝

22/100

“ .”

🚫

32/100

“Run and don't walk away from her.”

💪 Minority Defense

70/100

“Anyone that has given her a poor rating DID NOT TRY in this class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • most student questions got I don't know.
  • She just sits there reading from her slides expecting her students to hang onto every word.
  • Notes were messy, lectures unfocused.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • class average was around 50%.
  • yet I would find random questions on there.
  • It's difficult to get an A, but not impossible.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • She does lock students out if they are late and makes rude comments once she lets them in.
  • She gets defensive when you ask questions.
  • I wish I never took her class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

29 reviews with long time span and strongly repeated themes about disorganization and some positive outliers.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 514

Course coverage

BIO2059 reviews
BIO1077 reviews
BIO1012 reviews
BIOL1072 reviews
BIOL2102 reviews
Show 7 more courses
BIO1001 review
BIO1111 review
BIO2101 review
BIO2111 review
BIS2051 review
COS1261 review
PHYS2201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 1 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

4

B 3 · B- 1

C range

3

C 3

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3