AI Rate Professor

English

Victoria Freeman

ENG205 · ESL122 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENGL205 · 46 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
72.34%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Worth it if , but skip if you need a warm, hands-off easy A professor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardContract gradingComplete/incomplete essaysTough on AIClear CanvasPolarizing demeanor
  • Many students , and organized Canvas design.
  • A sizable minority report rudeness, AI accusations, gatekeeping, or harsh interpersonal tone.
  • Best if , and want structured writing practice rather than a free A vibe.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Complete/incomplete essays and revisions make As attainable, but perfectionism, AI scrutiny, and follow-through still block free rides.

Online has and AI; in-person more often says do the work and you are fine.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Content is usually straightforward English writing and .

Both formats call work doable; online locked modules and AI rules can feel harder than the content itself.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

46/100

with low patience for late arrivals.

Online is often flexible; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

, but a loud minority warns of rude interactions and .

In-person lean more positive; online is more polarized with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Contract or complete/incomplete essay grading with revisions is student-friendly, but tough-grader and AI-policing complaints pull the experience down.

Format shift

Online criticism of harsh AI judgments is stronger; .

Workload

Moderate

54/100

Usually a ; some terms feel busy with reading, group work, or catch-up after absences.

Format shift

Both formats center essays; a minority of in-person and .

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

, and care, while others describe condescension, weak feedback, or unprofessional conflict.

Format shift

In-person averages warmer; online has sharper negative peaks around communication and AI disputes.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Main stakes are essays with complete/incomplete scoring, revisions, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Both formats are essay-driven; online adds progression gates and process checks for AI.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, group work, and easy success if you show up and revise incomplete essays.

Main concern

Occasional rudeness, busywork, or and late-work rules still show up.

What students said

“i love Mrs,. V. because she cares. and you just have to do them.”
ENG101
“Just show up and ! .”
ENG205
“If you're looking for an easy A, look elsewhere.”
ENG205

Remote format

Online

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and , while critics cite AI policing, rudeness, and locked progression.

Main concern

AI authenticity disputes and perceived harsh tone create high stress for some online students.

What students said

“The . Very straightforward.”
ENG101
“ and they're pass/fail. If you get anything less than 100, you can revise and resubmit.”
ENG101
“Yet accused me of AI and was extremely disrespectful.”
ENGL205

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly essay and quiz based with revision paths; reviews do not clearly prove webcam proctoring.

Complete/incomplete essaysRevisions allowedWeekly quizzesAI process checksGroup discussions

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

projects, and attendance-linked participation more than strict proctored finals.

Contract graded essaysChapter quizzesGroup projectsRevision opportunities
“ and 4 main essays which are graded complete/incomplete”
ENG205
“ .”
ENG205

Online

Online assessment , and AI authenticity expectations rather than described Lockdown exams.

Complete/incomplete essaysMultiple attempts on practice workAI process documentationWeekly quizzes
“ and they're pass/fail. If you get anything less than 100, you can revise and resubmit.”
ENG101
“3 essays graded as complete - incomplete and the .”
ENG205
“Be prepared to give her the link to your google document to show your process”
ENG205

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're looking for an easy A, look elsewhere. , and holds students accountable—great class if you want to grow as a writer!”

Voice snapshots generated from 47 reviews (22 online, 25 in and polarized interpersonal feedback. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“ . Professor Freeman explains everything clearly and gives detailed and .”

⚠️ Polarizing Tone

35/100

“She is unnecessarily rude which does not make a good teacher.”

📝

72/100

“ and they're pass/fail. If you get anything less than 100, you can revise and resubmit.”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“This was my favorite class and I told .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The . Very straightforward.
  • and truly cares about student success.
  • she can be pretty rude for no apparent reason at times

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • as well. Just show up and !
  • If you're looking for an easy A, look elsewhere.
  • Easy A even if !

Theme 3

🤖 About AI & Expectations

  • Dont expect to use chatgbt or another ai and pass the class.
  • accused me of AI and was extremely disrespectful.
  • Be prepared to give her the link to your google document to show your process

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

47

Recent reviews read by the AI

46

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-seven reviews with and , and repeated themes of contract grading versus interpersonal conflict support high credibility.

Inside 47 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 511

Course coverage

ENG20525 reviews
ENG10114 reviews
ENGL1013 reviews
ENGL2053 reviews
ESL1222 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

34

A+ 14 · A 20

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1