AI Rate Professor

Web Design

Emily Kay

WEBD162 · WEBD168 · MULT127 · MULTI101 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take her if and can handle a busy online workload; skip if you need fast email replies and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Video LecturesHeavy Weekly WorkloadPatient With BeginnersMixed ResponsivenessOrganized Online Materials
  • Many and patient coding guidance for beginners.
  • Workload can feel heavy with and projects especially online.
  • Recommendation is polarized with strong fans and strong avoiders depending on communication and pace.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Students can earn A grades but comments stress you must try hard complete heavy work and that it is not an automatic easy A.

Online comments explicitly say not an easy A; in person notes skill growth without free-A language.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

yet still involves coding UX concepts and dense weekly material.

Both formats describe useful but non-trivial web and design content; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory with limited evidence of fully optional participation.

Online and in ; one online note said no.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

Take-again sentiment is split between excellent-lecturer praise and .

Online is more polarized on responsiveness; in person leans warmer on teaching style.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Reported grades include A and A-minus with little evidence of harsh curving or .

Format shift

Online grades span A to B-plus; in person rarely report letter grades.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Weekly videos quizzes homework and class.

Format shift

Online complaints about 5-6 hour video weeks are stronger; in and homework.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

and though a minority report slow replies and weak engagement.

Format shift

Online praises video quality; in person praises classroom clarity and confidence-building exercises.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

and projects more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

and a ; in person emphasizes exercises and applied design work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In and real skill gains with occasional workload warnings.

Main concern

Reading video and .

What students said

“she is the . Her and she has really helpful exercises and examples.”
MULTI101
“"pump the brakes" on the workload lady. With the amount of text she wants you to read, videos to watch, and ”
MULT127
“Great course, I learned soooo much. I actually feel like a web designer after taking this class.”
WEBD168

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections center on recorded videos quizzes and complaints about volume old videos and .

Main concern

Long and .

What students said

“This is by far the . The online video materials that the professor provides are so informative and well done.”
WEBD162
“Get ready for some serious time with video lectures if you're taking one of her online classes! I had to sit through 5-6 hours if video lectures each week”
MULT127
“it is not an easy A, you really have to try hard.”
MULT127

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize quizzes projects and applied work more than strictly proctored sit-down finals.

Weekly QuizzesFinal ProjectDiscussion Board Submissions

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews focus on exercises examples and skill practice with .

Applied ExercisesProject Style Work
“ and examples”
MULTI101
“You will really learn advanced coding if .”
WEBD168

Online

Online and a time-heavy final project rather than proctored exams.

Weekly QuizzesFinal ProjectDiscussion Boards
“ ”
MULT127
“The for this course and took me so much time to complete”
MULT127

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is by far the . The online video materials that the professor provides are so informative and well done.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews across online and in person formats, highlighting teaching clarity workload and mixed recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

70/100

“Amazing lecturer - Prof. .”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“I had to sit through 5-6 hours if video lectures each week, on top of 1-2 quizzes and 2 homework assignments.”

⚖️ Grade Effort

52/100

“it is not an easy A, you really have to try hard.”

👍 Split Recommendation

46/100

“ . Her weekly quizzes often had answers that didn't really fit”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The online video materials that the professor provides are so informative and well done.
  • and patient.
  • Her and and examples.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it is not an easy A, you really have to try hard.
  • The class was not 'easy' but the really know the material.
  • The for this course

Theme 3

⏰ About Workload & Support

  • .
  • Never responded to emails answering the question you asked.
  • you'll be lucky if you have time brush your teeth after meals!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across years with mixed detail and polarized tone give a usable but not rock-solid signal.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MULT1276 reviews
WEBD1624 reviews
1272 reviews
1682 reviews
MULTI1011 review
Show 1 more courses
WEBD1681 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 3 · A- 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values