AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Gulay Dinckan

ANTH101 · ANTH103 · ANT102 · ANTH102A · ANTH102 · 120 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
17.46%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

content is manageable but grading and communication make a good grade feel out of reach.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh graderVague rubricsPower trip vibeHeavy discussionsAvoid
  • Students say the material is not hard, but , and impossible to please.
  • Discussion boards with long word counts and .
  • Most recent reviews urge running away; a few older positives do not reverse the trend.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Many say the class content is easy but so harsh and opaque that even strong students end with B or C.

Online and in , as the barrier to an A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Anthropology material itself is often called basic or not difficult; the struggle is standards and quizzes.

Both formats call content doable but process painful.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Skip-class warnings, phone bans, and .

In person is clearly strict; online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Roughly one in ; recent reviews overwhelmingly say do not take under any circumstance.

; older positive in-person outliers are rare.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

; students report zeros for minor discussion issues and no rubrics clarity.

Format shift

and in person.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Long discussion posts, many quizzes or exams, journals, and .

Format shift

; in person stacks quizzes and worksheets.

Teaching experience

Poor

20/100

Students describe vague instructions, rude responses, misinformation on quizzes, and little constructive help.

Format shift

Both formats are largely negative; a few pre-2019 positives call her caring.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Heavy mix of timed quizzes, exams, and long graded discussions or worksheets.

Format shift

Online leans discussion plus quizzes; in person leans quizzes, exams, and worksheets.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe strict classroom control, harsh worksheets, and a power-trip atmosphere, with rare older praise.

Main concern

and punitive classroom management.

What students said

“If you don't please her power trip you're failing.”
ANTH102
“Please flee this class!”
ANT102
“She is usually disrespectful to her students”
ANTH102

Remote format

Online

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students report harsh discussion grading, confusing quiz wording, slow grade updates, and AI-accusation stress.

Main concern

Harsh, inconsistent grading on discussions and .

What students said

“ . Extremely harsh on grading, quizzes are timed between 15-20 minutes”
ANTH102
“ .”
ANTH102
“ and she is very unhelpful. Almost as if she trying to fail her students.”
ANTH102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Timed quizzes and exams with assessment high risk.

Timed quizzesHarsh discussion gradingConfusing question wordingMultiple examsStrict AI policy

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person , and strict classroom rules on test days.

10 quizzes4 exams plus finalHarsh worksheetsNo makeup movie days
“There are 10 total quizzes (lowest one dropped), 4 exams (lowest one dropped), and .”
ANTH102
“4 Discussion worksheets that are graded very harshly.”
ANTH102

Online

Online quizzes are short-timed and often poorly worded; discussions face extreme length and AI scrutiny.

Timed 15-20 min quizzes750-word discussionsStrict AI enforcement
“quizzes are timed between 15-20 minutes”
ANTH102
“the excessive discussion board requirements, especially the 750-word minimums”
ANTH102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (36 online, 14 in and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫

16/100

“ UNLESS YOU ENJOY SUFFERING!”

⚖️

12/100

“The class isn't difficult at all. !”

🧩 Vague Standards

20/100

“She says she wants the work one way then grades it a very different way.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does not provide clear guidance or
  • Communication is TERRIBLE

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • YOU ARE GUARANTEED a C
  • it is literally her personalized standards that are poorly explained
  • Even strong students get dinged on discussions

Theme 3

📝

  • 750-word minimums
  • and poorly written
  • Genuine misinformation spreader. and quizzes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

120

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews with large recent volume and and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 511
3 out of 53
2 out of 510
1 out of 575

Course coverage

ANTH10230 reviews
ANT10211 reviews
ANTH1016 reviews
ANTH1032 reviews
ANTH102A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 5 · A- 2

B range

11

B+ 5 · B 4 · B- 2

C range

11

C+ 5 · C 4 · C- 2

D range

2

D 2

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1