AI Rate Professor

Interior Design

Sarah Kim

INTE112B · INTE115 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Strong pick for interior design if , and solid outside practice.

Best fit · Effort For RewardVery organizedClear feedbackTough critiquesStrict attendanceDesign program favorite
  • and
  • Kind, structured critiques when students connect;
  • Attendance and program software skills matter a lot

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

As are common when work meets her standards, but tough critiques and bias claims mean grades are not free.

In-person reviews report more As; one online review ended at C+.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Content is often called simple or clear, though new design software and drawing skill add load.

Both formats call content manageable; online adds software and drawing demands.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and tardies are strictly enforced.

and online.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Most recent in-person students love her organization; older online critique is cooler.

; online mixed with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

and critiques that some students read as biased.

Format shift

Online critique of rubric mismatch; .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

; others report heavy outside time and skill practice.

Format shift

Online students emphasize more outside drawing and software time.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and caring critiques dominate positive reviews.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Projects, critiques, and participation drive .

Format shift

Neither format emphasizes traditional exams; design work and critiques dominate.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person praise for organization, feedback, and being a .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“She is honestly so amazing! ”
INTE112B
“ .”
INTE112B
“ though.”
INTE115

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but critique-heavy; one strong and drops.

Main concern

and skills expected without enough prep.

What students said

“ and let you know about upcoming assignments.”
INTE112B
“Shes a and often is biased and grades on criteria not mentioned on the .”
INTE115

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove traditional exams; assessment centers on projects and critiques.

Critique-based gradingProject workNo clear exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize critiques and .

Project critiquesClear assignment expectations
“ and also mentions things that could be improved upon”
INTE115

Online

Online reviews ; and assignments.

CritiquesAssignments
“She does critique a lot and if it's not to her liking she will call you out on it.”
INTE112B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Learned a lot. Always good at answering questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting organization, critiques, and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🗂️ Organization

85/100

“ ! I have had this professor for two classes.”

⚖️

38/100

“ though. Be prepared to be called out by her critics”

❤️ Student Favorite

80/100

“One of so far.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her lectures and videos keep you interested
  • You know what is expected of you in class and assignments

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • class content is pretty simple
  • and often is biased
  • A and a

Theme 3

⏰

  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 6 reviews with mixed formats and years; but sample is small.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

INTE112B3 reviews
INTE1153 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values