AI Rate Professor

Art History

Emiko Lewis-Sanchez

ART101 · ARTF107 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
45.45%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you need an easy online art credit and can tolerate busy work and ; avoid if you want rich art-history teaching.

Best fit · Easy A HunterPolarizing ExperienceBusy Work HeavyEasy A If You SubmitTough Unexplained DeductionsCreative Online Modules
  • Recent ART101 reviews call the class an easy A with light weekly work; older ARTF107 reviews slam busy work and poor teaching.
  • Grades often land high if work is submitted, but and .
  • ; open-book quizzes appear in some modules.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Many students report an easy A if they submit weekly work on time, though some hit unexplained deductions.

Easy-A claims cluster in online ART101; older online ARTF107 and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is generally not intellectually hard; complaints center on busy work volume, not complex concepts.

Both formats describe easy material; difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

; a minority report strict login or class presence rules.

; some older online and in-person comments note mandatory presence or login.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

; half warn to avoid due to busy work and poor teaching.

Recent online ART101 leans recommend; older online ARTF107 and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Many earn A/A+, but and .

Format shift

Online ART101 feels clearer; online ARTF107 and some online comments report harsh or .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Frequent weekly quizzes, readings, discussions, and busy-work modules create high time cost for limited learning.

Format shift

Online ARTF107 drives heavy workload complaints; recent ART101 online and one in-person review sound lighter.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Students split between creative caring modules and claims that she does not teach and only assigns busy work.

Format shift

Online ART101 recent praise contrasts with older online ARTF107 and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Grade is driven by weekly modules, discussions, quizzes, portfolios, and .

Format shift

Online emphasizes weekly modules and open-book quizzes; , and film-based tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one calls ART101 an easy A with light weekly tasks; others call lectures weak or incoherent and advise finding another teacher.

Main concern

Weak lecture presence and inconsistent classroom experience.

What students said

“W professor tbh. easy ass class. , and an artist portfolio.”
ART101
“Find a different teacher, you will not enjoy having this one.”
ARTF107
“Professor doesn't say anything on lectures .... .... professor sucks”
ART101

Remote format

Online

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

newer ART101 students report , and easy As; older ARTF107 students report copy-from-book busy work, little teaching, and .

Main concern

Busy work without learning value and unexplained grade deductions.

What students said

“This class is very easy if you do your home work. It is a easy A.”
ART101
“SO MUCH BUSY WORK. Completely bizarre and unhelpful activities. Never discusses artwork or lives of artists.”
ARTF107
“ on time and done 100% correctly but will not explain to you why points are taken off.”
ART101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and rather than strict closed-book proctoring.

Open Book QuizzesWeekly QuizzesFill-in-the-Blank TestsArtist Portfolio

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests from art movies; proctoring policy is not clearly stated.

Open Book QuizFilm-Based Tests
“ , and an artist portfolio.”
ART101
“ ”
ART101

Online

Online students mention open-book fill-in-the-blank tests and easy weekly quizzes; .

Open Book TestsWeekly QuizzesFill-in-the-Blank
“ . Use an OCR to speed this process up.”
ARTF107
“there is and they are really easy so dont worry.”
ART101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class is very easy if you do your home work. It is a easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews (20 online, 6 in person), highlighting split teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“This professor is not here to teach people anything.”

👍 Recommendation Split

46/100

“ .”

📝 Busy Work Load

34/100

“If of learning, you're in luck.”

🅰️ Easy Grade Path

76/100

“W professor tbh. easy ass class... idgaf it was an easy A”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I still admire how well she created this class. So creative and interactive.
  • Develops none of her own content... it's all links to outside curriculum.
  • Professor doesn't say anything on lectures .... she is more like a watcher than a teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class is very easy if you do your home work. It is a easy A.
  • Easy assignments but a at all
  • on time and done 100% correctly

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • SO MUCH BUSY WORK. Completely bizarre and unhelpful activities.
  • Must spend hours copying verbatim answers out of a book for hundreds of questions.
  • I was able to knock out a if I wanted.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

26 reviews spanning 2008-2025 with detailed comments and a clear ART101 vs ARTF107 split support a stable but polarized picture.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 513

Course coverage

ARTF10715 reviews
ART10111 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 7 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1