AI Rate Professor

Communication

Rhonda Trust

ORALINTRP · SPEECH101 · SPEE135 · SPEE103 · COM211 · SPEECH103 · SPEECH · SPEECH135 · SPEECH111 · COS210 · COM207 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you need speech or communication support and can handle a strict, personality-driven classroom.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing PersonalityTough GraderCaring MentorLecture HeavyAttendance Mandatory
  • Recent COM211 reviews warn she is a .
  • Older speech students , and confidence-building.
  • ; workload and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some call the class easy if you try and respect her, but and .

Evidence is almost entirely in-person; the one .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Speech and communication content is often described as easy or not challenging at college level, though .

In-person speech courses drive the easier-content picture; online evidence is too thin to compare.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

.

and COS courses; online also marked mandatory in the one review.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

Official take-again rate is about 40 percent, matching a sharp split between loving mentors and run-away warnings.

Nearly all recommendation signal is in-person; the sole .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

; critics say she is irrational or uncompromising on standards.

Format shift

; in-person also has older claims that trying hard earns a good grade.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Some courses are one major paper or speeches; others tag lots of homework and test-heavy work.

Format shift

Online COM207 reports lots of homework; in-person ranges from light speech work to heavy homework.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Empathetic speech coach for some students, but many call her uncaring, immature, or poorly suited to teach.

Format shift

; online is strongly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Speeches, a literature-review paper, tests, and .

Format shift

In-person mixes papers, speeches, and tests; and reading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

many speech students praise empathy and comfort for presentations, while recent and older critics call her power-hungry, immature, or uncaring.

Main concern

Harsh personality clashes and .

What students said

“I LOVED PROF TRUST! ”
COS210
“ !! She genuinely does not care about the well being of students”
com211
“as long as you try hard and respect her, you will get a good grade”
SPEECH

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online COM207 review calls her irrational, hard to reach, and a and homework.

Main concern

Communication gaps and .

What students said

“Irrational and ”
COM207

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize test-heavy and presentation-based assessment more than a single proctoring policy.

Test heavySpeech presentationsMajor paper

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and speeches; reviews do not clearly prove proctoring software or open-book rules.

Test heavyIn-class speeches
“ ”
com211

Online

Online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !! She genuinely does not care about the well being of students or their work in the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews spanning speech and communication courses, highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“SH is the most empathetic person and personable person!”

👍 Recommendation Split

40/100

“BEWARE OF RHONDA TRUST!!!”

⚖️

32/100

“Irrational and ”

❤️ Supportive Mentoring

70/100

“she supported me through my presentation and gave me a pep talk before which made me feel much more comfortable”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is really easy to distract and will spend the entire class just chatting with us
  • Very nice and helpful teacher
  • horrible personality to deal with, unhelpful and snobby

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • as long as you try hard and respect her, you will get a good grade
  • Not really challeged in this class, was to easy for college level

Theme 3

⚠️ About Personality Risks

  • Love to have authority over nothing
  • This person is a Powerhunger
  • !! more thatn half of class students dropped

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two reviews span 2003-2025 with detailed quotes, but opinions are polarized and many older speech reviews lack grades.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 58

Course coverage

SPEE1355 reviews
SPEECH4 reviews
com2112 reviews
COS2102 reviews
SPEECH1032 reviews
Show 7 more courses
1111 review
COM2071 review
ORALINTRP1 review
SPEE1031 review
SPEECH1011 review
SPEECH1111 review
SPEECH1351 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values