AI Rate Professor

Business

Robert Hertel

BUSE140 · BUSE100 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

; find another business instructor with and real support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsive OnlineVague SyllabusStudy.com HeavyGraded by Few ThingsRude Emails
  • Most students describe little teaching presence and constant redirects to a vague syllabus.
  • Major papers or midterm and prompts.
  • Online sections using Study.com plus huge .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Few graded items and unless and nail every major assignment.

Online students mostly struggle or drop; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Content itself is not advanced business theory, but and heavy notes make it feel harder than it should.

Online Study.com load feels heavy; depth.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

80/100

as not mandatory, especially online.

Online is consistently optional; and optional.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

17/100

Only about 17 percent would take again, with and unhelpful communication.

; in-person has one strong yes among several no or neutral outcomes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

and graded-by-few-things tags mean mistakes on papers or midterms sink the course.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of , and high-stakes papers create heavy busywork despite limited teaching.

Format shift

Online note pages and Study. ; in-person still reports time-consuming HW.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students describe an absent, rude, and .com.

Format shift

Online is strongly awful; review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Course hinges on a few papers or midterm and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize few high-weight assignments; online adds Study. .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and few graded items, with one older positive BUSE100 outlier and one flexible self-paced success story.

Main concern

.

What students said

“If you can work without much direct instruction, you can get a good grade.”
BUSE140
“His syllabus is very vague and filled with his own credentials”
BUSE140
“he is one of the ”
BUSE100

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are almost uniformly negative: absent instructor, , and Study. .

Main concern

No and poor communication.

What students said

“Completely unhelpful, whenever asked for more information he sends you to the syllabus”
BUSE140
“just refers to the syllabus”
BUSE100
“REQUIRES you to write a page of notes per section( ALMOST 200 PAGES!!!)”
BUSE140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

High-stakes midterms and finals with .

Vague midterm and final promptsFew graded itemsHigh-stakes papers

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final papers with vague prompts and few other graded pieces.

Vague final promptFew assignments
“The mid-term had a prompt and page count while the needed”
BUSE140
“Only 3 assignments. Must do well on each for a good grade”
BUSE140

Online

Online students report midterms and and .

Vague midtermVague finalUnclear submission
“We had a mid-term that and the ”
BUSE140
“keeps referring to the syllabus which provides little information about 2 big assignments worth 50% of the grade”
BUSE140

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Completely unhelpful, whenever asked for more information he sends you to the syllabus (which is already very vague) or gives you the definition of a word.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 business reviews, highlighting absentee online teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Uses a study com to FULLY teach the class while remaining 100% uninvolved”

👎

17/100

“Complete disappointed!!!!!!!”

📧 Poor Communication

10/100

“He's rude in emails and doesn't seem to care about the students”

📝 Vague High-Stakes Work

25/100

“the ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • not communicative, very little communication when asked a question
  • Completely absent for class and very rude in emails
  • he is one of the

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • Only 3 assignments. Must do well on each for a good grade
  • REQUIRES you to write a page of notes per section( ALMOST 200 PAGES!!!)
  • Graded by few things

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • Syllabus is vague
  • no indication how to turn in

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews are recent and highly consistent on unhelpfulness, though the sample is smaller and one older positive review exists.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 510

Course coverage

BUSE14010 reviews
BUSE1002 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

6

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 2