AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Allison Demoose

MATH96 · MATH116 · MATH46 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Only take Demoose if and use office hours; her .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringLots of HomeworkDisorganized LecturesHard to FollowOffice Hours Available
  • Students repeatedly call her kind and willing to help, with and late-work flexibility.
  • Lectures are often described as disorganized, , and weak for note-taking.
  • Workload is heavy, especially in short terms, and several students report low grades or drops.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Passing is possible with heavy practice and office hours, but reported grades include C, D, F, and As.

Only one online review; grade pain and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

and lots of homework make the course feel hard, especially in 8-week formats.

Online review also called the 8-week workload intense for a full-time worker.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and say showing up is essential to keep up and pass.

as not mandatory; in-person reviews more often require presence.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

About 40% would take again; admirers value her care while critics say teaching clarity is too weak.

The ; in-person recommendations are mixed to negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

She offers late work, extra chances, and support, but and low reported grades still appear.

Format shift

Online mentions delayed tests and ; .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lots of , and short-term intensity are repeated across reviews.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy work; 8-week sections are especially brutal.

Teaching experience

Average

44/100

Warm and supportive personality is consistent, but and disorganized.

Format shift

Online felt slightly clearer because pacing slowed; in-person clarity complaints dominate.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and tests matter; HW is often said to help on exams.

Format shift

Online is test-heavy with multiple sites; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and harsh notes that lectures jump around and leave students lost.

Main concern

Disorganized lectures and support.

What students said

“she is very in a and forth talking about 4 things at the same time”
MATH96
“Sweet lady, but terrible teacher.”
MATH46
“If you show up for class, she has your back and .”
MATH96

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One online review describes a but a heavy 8-week load and .

Main concern

Compressed online pace plus multiple platforms can overwhelm students with full-time jobs.

What students said

“She was one of the nicest professors I have ever met. Delayed a test because people mentioned they were overwhelmed.”
MATH116

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are standard course tests; one review notes no calculators, and another notes paranoia about cheating online.

Test HeavyNo Calculators (some sections)Homework-Linked Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and at least one no-calculator policy, but little detailed proctoring language.

No CalculatorsHard Exams
“She wouldn't let us use calculators.”
MATH46
“She does give a lot of homework, but the HW helped me with the tests.”
MATH116

Online

One online review notes delayed tests for overwhelm and paranoia .

Delayed TestsCheating Paranoia
“Delayed a test because people mentioned they were overwhelmed. Is actually paranoid about people cheating.”
MATH116

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Sweet lady, but terrible teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews (1 online, 8 in person), centering care versus clarity and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Caring Support

70/100

“She literally takes care of you. Gets to know her class so she can see how everyone learns.”

🌀 Lecture Clarity Issues

44/100

“she is very in a and forth talking about 4 things at the same time”

📚

25/100

“there is tons of HW if math is your weaker subject stay away from this class.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • She was one of the nicest professors I have ever met.
  • put in the work
  • If you ask questions she won't shame you, but encourage.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Clarity

  • her lectures were so it was pretty much impossible to make comprehensible notes.
  • the
  • and didnt like help0ing with any of my questions

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • She also gives lots of HW during breaks
  • First time I took an 8 week course and was not ready for the workload w/ FT job.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across many years show a , but sparse recent detail and few grade reports limit certainty.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH464 reviews
MATH1163 reviews
MATH962 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1