AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Olga Pilipets

STAT119 · MATH121 · STATS100 · MATH141 · MATH46 · MATH95 · MATH92 · MATH096 · MATH116 · MATH095 · MATH119 · MATH104 · 65 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
20.59%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid unless you are ready to self-teach math with a and little live instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf Teaching RequiredVideo Lectures OnlyLots of HomeworkKind but ConfusingTest Heavy
  • Many students say class time has almost no real teaching and learning is done via old videos and .
  • She is repeatedly described as kind and caring but , and hard to learn from.
  • Workload and mandatory video or participation load are the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earn As and self-study, while many report Ds, Fs, or incompletes.

Both formats show As for self-driven students and poor grades for others; effort required remains high overall.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Material may be standard, but and video-only structure make the content feel much harder.

; online reviews stress confusion and self-learning.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Many sections require attendance even when class time is just online work or long video watching.

In-person comments most strongly criticize mandatory sit-and-do-online sessions; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

and repeated run-away warnings outweigh occasional praise for kindness.

; online is also mostly negative with a few older positives.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

if homework and exams match, but some call her a .

Format shift

; few call her generous.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Students report dozens of weekly tasks, long lecture videos with embedded quizzes, and constant deadlines.

Format shift

In-person MATH119 comments are the harshest on volume; online also tags lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Consensus is kind person, weak teacher: monotone .

Format shift

; online echoes confusion and communication problems.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and multiple exams often similar to practice work.

Format shift

In-person notes exams around 40 percent plus homework and quizzes; and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person classes often assign pre-recorded videos as lecture while students do online work in class with .

Main concern

No real and .

What students said

“It might have well just been an online class since she does 0 teaching.”
STAT119
“I mean literally up to 30 a week. .”
MATH119

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections still suffer from unclear explanations, mistakes, poor communication, and heavy independent work.

Main concern

, and self-teaching despite online format.

What students said

“I learned everything by myself. If I went off of her instructions only, I would fail the class.”
MATH104
“The professor is so so many mistakes, doubts herself all the time”
STATS100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are standard difficulty for some and stressful for but still high-stakes.

OpenMath AttemptsExams Similar to HomeworkNo Formula Sheet Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

retries and exam weight around 40 percent in some terms.

OpenMath Two AttemptsExam HeavyQuiz Questions in Videos
“ try the answers twice and .”
MATH121
“She blends some quiz questions that are graded IN her lecture videos to make sure you watch them.”
MATH119

Online

Online comments rarely detail proctoring; one notes no formula sheet on a final and .

Homework-Like ExamsNo Formula Sheet on Final
“the and the .”
MATH119
“she won't allow you to bring a formula sheet on the .”
MATH104

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class is giving me breakdown after breakdown. RUN!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (10 online, 40 in person), highlighting self-teaching and workload themes. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“she is a horrible teacher she is the a paycheck she only uses videos to teach”

📚 Overwhelming Workload

18/100

“I have never had a class with . I mean literally up to 30 a week.”

🙋 Self Teaching Required

25/100

“ unless ready to teach urself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Most of the learning is done on our own.
  • she does 0 teaching.
  • makes constant mistakes

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you do your share, you'll be okay.
  • Material isn't too hard, but it is practically online

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Super kind professor and person but not the greatest teacher.
  • caring kind and respected but .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

65

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews spanning many years show a consistent pattern of , and mixed-to-poor teaching quality.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 59
3 out of 510
2 out of 56
1 out of 525

Course coverage

MATH11913 reviews
MATH10412 reviews
MATH11610 reviews
STATS1003 reviews
MATH0952 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH1412 reviews
MATH922 reviews
1191 review
MATH0961 review
MATH1211 review
MATH461 review
MATH951 review
STAT1191 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 4 · A 8

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

6

D+ 2 · D 3 · D- 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

4

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3