AI Rate Professor

History

Kristopher Nelson

HIST110 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

; and weak teaching make HIST110 a high-risk experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNever Grades On TimeGraded By Few ThingsLecture HeavyChaotic Grade EntryAvoid This Class
  • and As for some and unfair Fs for others.
  • Lectures are conversation-heavy, repetitive, and often off-topic rather than content-focused.
  • Almost every student who rated quality gave a 1 or 2 and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students received As because major work was never graded, though and grade-entry errors still create unfair risk.

All evidence comes from in-person HIST110 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Content is moderate history material, but and tests cover items not taught in class.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while others said it was not required.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Zero take-again support and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Few graded items, late or , and tough quiz scoring create high unfairness.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

68/100

Only a handful of quizzes and essays count, but delays and ungraded work still cause stress.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students describe boring, repetitive, off-topic lectures and almost no useful instruction.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grade depends on a few quizzes and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person HIST110 is marked by , and unreliable grade portal entries.

Main concern

Assignments may never be graded and .

What students said

“this prof didn't even grade our rough draft or ”
HIST110
“Would rather stick a cactus in ”
HIST110
“Would constantly input grades wrong”
HIST110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes require long written answers and .

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and essays are the main assessments; students report harsh expectations and delayed or missing grades.

Written quizzesEssay assignmentsDelayed grading
“For and expect more than what was required”
HIST110
“The things that are on the ”
HIST110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . !”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews spanning 2024-2025, highlighting grading failure and poor lectures. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

18/100

“If ur looking for the most boring, pointless class, this is the one for you.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ . !”

📂

22/100

“this prof didn't even grade our rough draft or ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He talks more about his ADHD than the material
  • for most of the lectures, he would review stuff from the previous class
  • Interesting lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Professor graded almost nothing so if you get one bad grade congrats u failed
  • He was also a as it was rare to get an A
  • only graded on four (ish) things

Theme 3

⏰

  • Had to wait months to get grades back
  • took over a month since the class officially ended, to submit official grades
  • Did

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed recent in-person reviews and poor teaching, but the small sample limits certainty.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

HIST1105 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values