AI Rate Professor

Nutrition

Katie Ferraro

NUTR155 · NUTR150 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Solid online nutrition pick if you read weekly and meet deadlines; expect little flexibility and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Grading CriteriaNo Late WorkRead The BookLight Intersession LoadMixed Communication
  • All six reviews are online nutrition courses with mostly As when students complete weekly reading and quizzes.
  • and fair, but late work is rarely accepted and .
  • Overall tone is positive for .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students consistently report As and A+s if they read chapters and .

All evidence comes from online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is manageable with weekly chapters and quizzes; lectures can be long but not conceptually brutal.

All evidence comes from online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

as not mandatory or not emphasized.

All evidence comes from online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and praise organization, with a minority criticizing reachability and rigidity.

All evidence comes from online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

and fair scoring, but little room for late work or in some terms.

Format shift

All evidence comes from online reviews.

Workload

Light

74/100

if you stay current, especially in intersession.

Format shift

All evidence comes from online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students call her knowledgeable, organized, and engaging, though a few say she is hard to reach online.

Format shift

All evidence comes from online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of chapter reading, quizzes, participation, and pre-recorded lectures .

Format shift

All evidence comes from online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and pre-recorded lectures; fair grading but strict deadlines and sometimes slow communication.

Main concern

No late work and .

What students said

“She was very quick to respond to student and if hardships may interfere with your ability to turn in work”
NUTR150
“WILL NOT accept late work; very unforgiving”
NUTR155
“If you do your part by reading the assigned chapters, you will do well”
NUTR150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are mainly quizzes and tests from book and lectures; reviews do .

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online tests and quizzes pull from assigned chapters and video lectures; .

Chapter quizzesTests from book and lecturesPre-recorded lectures
“ and her lectures”
NUTR150
“workload was light as long as you read the 4 chapters assigned per week and the quiz”
NUTR155

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Read the book and you'll pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 , and deadline rigidity. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Professor , and provided .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

70/100

“Loved this class. Prof. Ferraro is very fair and .”

⏱️ Deadline Strictness

40/100

“WILL NOT accept late work; very unforgiving.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • engaging, well-paced online course
  • pre-recorded video lectures and
  • I learned a lot and had fun

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you do your part by reading the assigned chapters, you will do well
  • No flexibility on deadline dates

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • NOT a good online communicator
  • emails took days to get a response

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six all-online reviews over several years and deadlines, but the small sample and mixed communication notes keep credibility medium.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

NUTR1504 reviews
NUTR1552 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values