AI Rate Professor

Biology

Morgan Wright

BIO144 · 203L · BIO107 · BIOL107 · BIO235 · BIO160 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
52.38%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you can work independently in lab and stay professional; many students prefer any other lab instructor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderLab focusedPolarizingCan be sarcasticSyllabus-driven
  • Many lab students call BIO107 doable if they follow the syllabus
  • A large cluster of reviews describe rudeness, arrogance, or unhelpful answers
  • Grades can be fine but the interpersonal experience is highly hit or miss

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Many report As or B+s in lab, but and .

Online sample is tiny and easy-sounding; and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, yet , and dense biology work.

In-person bio144 and writing-heavy 203L feel harder than basic BIO107 lab.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory and skipping is treated as a problem.

Almost all evidence is in person because online sample is small.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; many others explicitly say take anyone else.

Recent short reviews trend more positive than the harsh 2021-2022 cluster.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

nitpicking and unexplained point losses.

Format shift

A few newer reviews still .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Some labs finish in class, but other courses add lots of , and quiz prep.

Format shift

203L writing load is heavier than standard BIO107 lab comments.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Knowledge and clear syllabi help some students, while sarcasm and poor help-seeking experiences tank others.

Format shift

In-person lab interpersonal complaints dominate the negative half of the sample.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Mix of , and occasional writing rather than one pure assessment style.

Format shift

Online notes mention Proctorio quizzes; in person focuses on lab work and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and clear syllabus to reports of condescension, grade delays, and political digressions.

Main concern

Students who ask questions may feel shamed; and uneven support are recurring.

What students said

“Easy class, syllabus has it all!”
BIO107
“When asked for and walks away”
BIOL107
“Instead, he makes you feel ashamed. He is harder than the .”
BIO107

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

if you read the syllabus, but also flags Proctorio issues and hard communication.

Main concern

Proctoring glitches and curt communication with .

What students said

“Easy class, just read the syllabus ahead of time and read the labs and you'll be fine”
BIO107
“Proctorio kicked half of us from a .”
BIOL107
“Nit picks everything, acts like a young new teacher that isn't use to teaching yet”
BIO107

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment can feel strict due to tight quizzes, proctoring tools, and .

Tough graderQuizzes from PowerPointsProctorioLab practical work

Assessment risk

Strict

36/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

may not share, plus lab work and occasional writing.

PowerPoint quizzesLab workTough gradingNo shared slides
“All of share and flys thru.”
BIOL107
“He gives you the .”
203L

Online

Limited online comments mention Proctorio quiz issues and abrupt quiz content changes.

ProctorioQuiz content changesSyllabus-based labs
“Proctorio kicked half of us from a .”
BIOL107
“Easy class, just read the syllabus ahead of time and read the labs and you'll be fine”
BIO107

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ be better off.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 mostly in-person and grading complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

🧪

60/100

“ before lab ends”

🧱

34/100

“Be prepared to teach yourself and .”

🗣️ Helpfulness Split

45/100

“ and (as long as you arent screwing around).”

⚠️ Classroom Tone

30/100

“His passive aggressive demeanor does not go unnoticed and makes you feel dumb for asking a question.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This guy is so under rated
  • He wants the but sucks at showing it
  • interesting lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy class, syllabus has it all!
  • It's a tough class, you just have to put the time in.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support

  • he makes you feel ashamed.
  • Does not put grades in for weeks at a time
  • Answers emails with one sentence

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one reviews with only three online give a clear but smaller and more polarized sample, especially around 2022 labs.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

BIO1078 reviews
BIOL1077 reviews
203L2 reviews
Bio1602 reviews
bio1441 review
Show 1 more courses
Bio2351 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 1 · A 7 · A- 3

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2