AI Rate Professor

Interior Design

Ann Parker

ENTE125 · INTE125 · INTE210 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
46.15%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you like design history and can sit through long lectures; skip if you need tight organization and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture HeavyLong LecturesSubjective GradingCaring When EngagedAttendance Critical
  • Interior history and related classes are lecture-dense with long talks and repeated slide content.
  • Grades can feel personal or As.
  • Attendance and note-taking matter more than textbooks for success.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Many As and follow her style, but tough-grader and random-grade complaints keep it from an easy free A.

In person drawing and older history reviews feel easier; recent online and some history sections feel harsher.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is not concept-brutal, but long lectures and dense history make the load feel heavier than the rating suggests.

Online redundancy raises fatigue; in person drawing is lighter than history lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Nearly every review flags mandatory attendance or skip-class-you-will-not-pass messaging.

Both online Zoom and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

Supporters love her passion and ; , and structure messy.

In person drawing reviews are warmer; online and recent history reviews are cooler.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

; others say grades follow her taste or feel random.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

44/100

Weekly lectures, notebooks, quizzes, and textbook.

Format shift

Online doubles lecture time with prework plus live Zoom.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Knowledge and care show up often, but disorganization, tangents, and .

Format shift

In person studio/drawing feedback is stronger than lecture-history delivery.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of drawing or notebook work, projects, quizzes, and tests depending on the course.

Format shift

INTE210 is assignment-only; INTE125 mixes lectures, quizzes, and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person she can be warm and inspiring, especially in drawing, but history lectures are often called long, chatty, and .

Main concern

Biased or and three-hour read-through lectures.

What students said

“there are .”
INTE210
“She stands behind the computer and reads for 3 hours, really quickly covering way too much information”
INTE125
“ exact test as a class right before you take it”
INTE125

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online adds long pre-class videos plus multi-hour Zoom with , and big projects.

Main concern

Redundant lecture load and .

What students said

“You have to listen to the 2+ hr slides before attending her class then in the 3 hr zoom she will be lecturing the same thing again.”
INTE125
“ , and all assignments and and hard to understand.”
INTE125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

History exams are often lecture-based and reviewed in class; .

Slide Reviews Before TestsLecture BasedWeekly Quizzes OnlineFew or No Exams in Studio

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person tests are often previewed with slides or class review, while drawing .

Class Test ReviewLecture Based ExamsAssignment Focused Studio
“she goes over the exact test as a ”
INTE125
“there are .”
INTE210

Online

Online work centers on weekly quizzes with two attempts plus large projects rather than heavy proctored finals.

Weekly QuizzesTwo AttemptsBig Projects
“ , and 2 big assignments.”
INTE125

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a , and an awful teacher be warned!”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews with Medium credibility due to moderate sample size and mixed course formats.

🎯 Teaching Delivery

48/100

“She stands behind the computer and reads for 3 hours, really quickly covering way too much information to actually digest.”

🗓️

18/100

“It's not that hard, if you go to every class and pay attention then you'll do fine.”

⚖️

48/100

“Gets biased and .”

❤️ When It Clicks

70/100

“Ann is very knowledgeable in this field, and she makes her Presentation and Rendering class extremely fun and peaceful.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are long and boring
  • She loves to talk and goes off on tangents
  • Taking notes will get you very far.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • it feels like she randomly assigns grades with a pick from a hat
  • Many people complained about the workload, but I found it manageable.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is so caring and does an amazing job of preparing you for the exams.
  • Ann is very knowledgeable and passionate
  • She's very sweet and gives good info

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen and , but sample size and mixed eras keep confidence medium.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

INTE12514 reviews
ENTE1251 review
INTE2101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 5 · A 4

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values