AI Rate Professor

Physical Sciences

Morteza Mohssenzadeh

ENGE151 · ENGE210 · ENG250 · ENG200 · ENGE101 · MATH116 · MENG210 · ENG101 · MATH60 · ENGIN101 · MATH32 · ENG151 · ENGE200 · 156 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
46.3%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take him only for ENG151-style CAD if ; avoid ENG200/statics if you have another option.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-Taught HeavyPolarizing by CourseLife-Story LecturesTough on StaticsCAD Friendly
  • ENG151/CAD is often doable and even liked if and ask for help.
  • ENG200/statics draws heavy criticism for , and life-story lectures.
  • Many students report and a need to use tutors or YouTube.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Many students still land As in CAD with projects, but statics and math sections , and luck with the curve.

Online reviews stress zero-tolerance timed submissions; in-person reviews stress brutal exams with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

CAD becomes manageable after early weeks, but statics and related engineering content is repeatedly called hard and mismatched to lectures.

Both formats describe content as hard; online adds vector-heavy statics without strong live problem walkthroughs.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

, and several warn that skipping tanks participation or leaves you lost.

In-person reviews more often stress mandatory seats; as not mandatory but still unforgiving on deadlines.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Students often recommend him for ENG151 and warn hard against ENG200, matching the .

Online ENG200 feedback is mostly avoid; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and graded-by-few-things tags are common, though some classes get a .

Format shift

Online students emphasize automatic zeros for late test uploads; in .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

, and multiple high-stakes tests create a heavy load especially in statics.

Format shift

and practice load; online adds tight timed submission pressure.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

some call him caring and slides, rambling life stories, and teaches little.

Format shift

In-person CAD praise is real; online and statics sections are far more negative on clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and timed quizzes carrying outsized weight over day-to-day learning support.

Format shift

; in person also stresses hard midterms and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

ENG151 can feel supportive and project-based, while statics and , and self-taught.

Main concern

Lectures often feel like life advice plus slides, while full book and tutor path.

What students said

“This class is self taught do not waste your time and money on this class! He is a complete joke and will hardly teach.”
ENG151
“The lectures will look nothing like the homework and the .”
ENGE200
“MUST USE TEXBOOK ( just demonstrations). If you are stuck or don't understand something, ASK (KEY TO SUCCESS IN HIS CLASS).”
ENG151

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ENG200 and life talk, with strict timed Canvas submissions and .

Main concern

Timed tests and can zero a large grade slice.

What students said

“You get a short amount of time to do the tests and quizzes and if your as a single pdf before the time limit, you get a 0 on it.”
ENGE200
“just reads the PowerPoint. I learned from Youtube and ”
ENG200
“he only "teaches" from powerpoint presentations that are provided to him from the text book and does not work out any problems”
ENGE200

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

than lectures, with online timed PDF rules and in-person format pickiness.

Test HeavyHard ExamsTimed Canvas SubmissionsSpecial FBD FormatEnd Curve Sometimes

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as very hard, poorly matched to lectures, and graded in picky formats, sometimes followed by a .

Hard MidtermsLecture-Exam MismatchSpecial FBD WayGrade Curve
“The first exam, the highest score was a 67%.”
ENGE200
“We'd cheer for 40% on tests. He pretends to be unsupportive at first but .”
MATH116

Online

Online tests and quizzes are short-window Canvas submissions as a single PDF, with zeros for lateness and little flexibility.

Timed Canvas TestsSingle PDF UploadNo Late AcceptQuiz Heavy
“if your as a single pdf before the time limit, you get a 0 on it”
ENGE200
“he does not answer emails, accept excuses, or ”
ENGE200

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Take him for ENGE151 but try to avoid him for ENGE200.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting the ENG151 vs ENG200 split, self-teaching load, and . Credibility rating: High.

📚

40/100

“This class is self taught do not waste your time and money on this class! He is a complete joke and will hardly teach.”

🧭 Course Split

42/100

“Take him for ENGE151 but try to avoid him for ENGE200.”

🧪

32/100

“The lectures will look nothing like the homework and the .”

❤️ CAD Support Side

70/100

“ and will show you how to do it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • just reads the PowerPoint
  • talks about himself more than half of the lecture
  • just demonstrations

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Each test is worth about 15% of your grade

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Professor Mo is a great person, but he is not that good of a teacher
  • and will show you how to do it
  • Nice guy, though...

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

156

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across years and courses show a consistent course-split pattern, so the polarized picture is well supported.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 561
4 out of 521
3 out of 515
2 out of 519
1 out of 540

Course coverage

ENG20015 reviews
ENGE2008 reviews
ENGE1517 reviews
ENG1516 reviews
ENG2504 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH1162 reviews
MATH602 reviews
ENG1011 review
ENGE1011 review
ENGE2101 review
ENGIN1011 review
MATH321 review
MENG2101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 8 · A 12

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

17

Drop/Withdrawal 7 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 9