AI Rate Professor

Hospitality

Nicole Matthews

HOSP170 · HOSP101 · HOSP166 · HOSP175 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want industry stories and will fight for grades; skip if you need consistent scoring or flexible support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerIndustry ExperiencedInspirational LecturesInconsistent GradingParticipation HeavyPolarizing
  • Many students love her real-world hospitality insight and engaging lectures.
  • Others report unfair grading, little compassion, and .
  • reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Strong participation and , but tough tests and .

Almost ; the one online review also flags incomplete credit.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

, yet tests and heavy prep raise the challenge.

; online notes confusion more than difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and participation is used to spot unprepared students.

Evidence is almost entirely in-person; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Only about one-third would retake her despite several five-star fans of her industry experience.

In-person reviews split hard; the sole online review is negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Reports of and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reading, notes, participation, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Strong industry storytelling and inspiration for some; cold or inconsistent for others.

Format shift

Older in-person praise is high; recent and COVID-era reviews are colder.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Papers, participation, and ; few formal study guides.

Format shift

and papers dominate comments; online focuses on assignment clarity.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person hospitality classes are either inspiring industry deep-dives or .

Main concern

Inconsistent grades on similar work and limited study aids.

What students said

“You are respectful and kind and your knowledge of the subject of Events Sponsorship made the class enjoyable”
HOSP170
“With the same exactly type of the student get A and the other one get D.”
HOSP170
“The professor showed no compassion whatsoever on the matter.”
HOSP166

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single but assignments confuse students and full credit is hard.

Main concern

and tough partial credit.

What students said

“students and the assignments are not graded full credit. I think this class should be teach in campus and not online”
HOSP175

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are often called hard and ; .

Hard TestsPapersParticipationNo Study Guides

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and papers may need grade appeals within 48 hours.

Hard TestsPapers48H Grade Appeal Window
“ ! Although, put in effort and participate and you'll survive!”
HOSP170
“you have 48H for arguing your grades be aware of that”
HOSP170

Online

One online review focuses on .

Assignment ConfusionPartial Credit
“students and the assignments are not graded full credit”
HOSP175

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“With the same exactly type of the student get A and the other one get D.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 polarized hospitality reviews, mostly in person. Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟 Industry Inspiration

75/100

“she has actually inspired me to become an event planner similar to her profession”

⚖️

34/100

“If do not argue about your grade with the teacher, she is gonna under grade you.”

📉 Recommendation Split

36/100

“The professor showed no compassion whatsoever on the matter.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She actually get's you engaged with her lectures with humor and inspiration
  • . Luoma left
  • Such a helpful professor! She is always willing to help

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • !
  • Don't bother asking if there is any study guides, or slides
  • one of the student get A and the other one get D

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support

  • showed no compassion whatsoever
  • students
  • after she just doesn't want talk to you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only 9 reviews with a wide quality split and limited recent detail reduce confidence.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HOSP1705 reviews
HOSP1752 reviews
HOSP1011 review
HOSP1661 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2