AI Rate Professor

Education

Mark Manasse

EDUCATION100 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

experiences swing from hilarious easy A to total waste of time.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizingElitistHilariousEasy onlineConflicting experiences
  • Only two reviews with opposite quality scores of 1 and 5.
  • In-person student calls him elitist and a waste of time.
  • Online high-school dual-enrollment student found him easy and funny.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Online student earned an A and called it really easy, but the other review offers no grade and paints a miserable experience.

Online evidence suggests easy A; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty ratings and comments conflict between really easy online and difficulty 5 in person.

easy dual-enrollment; in-person: rated very hard and worthless.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

; in-person attendance detail is missing.

Online evidence says mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

One enthusiastic yes and one total rejection leave recommendation split.

Online student recommends; recent in-person student does not.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

One A is reported online, but reviews.

Format shift

Online reports an A; .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Online calls the short dual-enrollment class easy; in-person implies high difficulty and low value.

Format shift

Formats disagree strongly on effort required.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Split between hilarious and good feedback versus elitist waste-of-time, with average quality only 3.0.

Format shift

Online is glowing; in-person is damning.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

Neither format details assessment structure beyond overall difficulty.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One recent in-person review harshly rejects the professor as elitist and the class as a waste.

Main concern

Perceived elitism and lack of value.

What students said

“Professor is elitist and this class is a total waste of time”
EDUCATION100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

One online high-school dual-enrollment review calls the class easy, funny, and recommendable.

Main concern

Single outdated dual-enrollment sample may not represent college sections.

What students said

“I took his class in high school for 8 weeks, it was . he makes jokes while teaching.”
EDUCATION100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor is elitist and this class is a total waste of time”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting reviews. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Polarized Ratings

40/100

“Professor is elitist and this class is a total waste of time”

😂 Online Easy & Funny

80/100

“it was . he makes jokes while teaching”

👍 Recommendation Split

40/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he makes jokes while teaching
  • elitist

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it was really easy
  • difficulty 5 in the harsh review
  • Grade A in the online dual-enrollment review

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting reviews years apart, one dual-enrollment online and .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

EDUCATION1002 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values