AI Rate Professor

English

Ronn Edmundson

ENG205 · ENG201 · ENGLSIH205 · ENG105 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENGL205 · 204 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
22.58%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you specifically want philosophical life lectures over clear English writing instruction.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnclear LecturesTough GraderRamblesLecture HeavyPolarizing
  • , and unrelated to writing skills.
  • Tough or ; low would-take-again rate near 23%.
  • A minority find him inspirational and life-changing if they match his style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Tough grader tags and effort and style match, not just showing up.

Online and ; in-person evidence is far larger.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Average difficulty is high and .

; online is mixed but still often frustrating.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while ; skip-class tags appear often.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Would-take-again is about 23% and most detailed reviews urge students not to enroll.

; online is also mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

; following exact criteria still often yields mediocre scores.

Format shift

Strict grading appears in .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and so-many-papers tags create a heavy writing load.

Format shift

Paper-heavy load is consistent online and in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Most students say lectures ramble, notes are illegible, and little practical English is taught.

Format shift

Online adds chat-only lectures; in-person adds board rambles and condescension.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Semester grade often rests on 2-4 papers plus occasional quizzes rather than many exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

criteria, and condescending tone; a small group loves his wisdom.

Main concern

, and lectures that .

What students said

“Hands down one of the ... He preached the whole time about irrelevant life lessons.”
ENG101
“The lectures are non sensical, and comprise of ineligible notes on the board.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online experience ranges from mixed to horrible, including chat-only lectures and weak guidance.

Main concern

, and poor engagement online.

What students said

“This professor would NEVER show his face during class. Almost NEVER spoke. He would only 'type' his lectures into the chat box.”
ENG101
“There was absolutely no guidance, , and he gave everyone an 85% on every paper because of the "poor organization".”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on a few papers and occasional quizzes with .

Few High-Stakes PapersPop QuizzesLecture HeavyVague Rubrics

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person grading often uses 2-4 papers, board notes, and .

Few PapersPop QuizzesIllegible Board Notes
“The entire semester is graded off 2-3 papers and one quiz.”
ENG205
“Beware of pop quizzes”
ENG101

Online

Online reviews emphasize papers and weak guidance; .

PapersWeak GuidanceChat Lectures
“he gave everyone an 85% on every paper because of the "poor organization".”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Hes very rude and EXTREMELY vague when it comes to explaining what you need to do for essays”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (4 online, 46 in and polarized outcomes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Rambles and .”

👎 Recommendation

24/100

“This was one of the .”

⚖️

28/100

“Prof. Edmundson has very particular and .”

📚 Workload

32/100

“By far the misfortune of having. We started with about thirty students and ended with about eight.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are out of pocket and make no sense but they will make you smile most of the time.
  • This professor sits there and rambles the entire class about random stuff
  • He does no teaching and is a pseudo professor with a chip on his shoulder.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He will be looking for mistakes in a paper even if it's good
  • Every time I did EXACTLY what he asked, I got a 75%
  • If you meticulously follow his criteria and you are already a strong writer then you should do fine.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • Talks down on students, and has made a few cry.
  • I left the class 20 minutes in because of how inappropriate/sexist/sexual he was being.
  • harasses and publicly humiliates students during the class period.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

204

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews across many years with consistent negative themes and a .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 537
3 out of 517
2 out of 539
1 out of 586

Course coverage

ENG10123 reviews
ENG20515 reviews
ENGL1015 reviews
ENGL2052 reviews
1011 review
Show 4 more courses
2051 review
ENG1051 review
ENG2011 review
ENGLSIH2051 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

9

B+ 5 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

6

C 3 · C- 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

12

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 5