AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Misty Hawkins

ART · ART155A · ART210 · ARTLIFEDRAWIN · ARTF155A · ART155 · ARTF210A · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you already draw well, can handle harsh critique, and want skill growth over an easy credit.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLecture HeavyPassive AggressiveSkip Class FailHarsh Critique
  • Many students describe long, low-energy lectures and a tense classroom vibe.
  • and high expectations punish beginners who need credit only.
  • A minority say she helps serious art students who ask for feedback and stay professional.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and particular standards mean you work for , and many report poor grades despite effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content and critique expectations feel advanced even in beginner drawing, with long studio sessions and strict standards.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Multiple reviews say attendance is required and .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most students warn others away due to harsh critiques, boring lectures, and a stressful vibe, with only limited praise for serious artists.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

and comments about losing points for small preference mismatches dominate.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Long in-class studio hours and outside assignments add .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Students split, but many call lectures endless, low-energy, and critique style demoralizing.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades center on in-class drawings, projects, and participation rather than written exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and high-pressure; attendance and professional conduct matter, and critiques often feel harsh.

Main concern

Rude or passive-aggressive critique and tough grading can crush beginners seeking an easy art credit.

What students said

“Absolute nightmare class. The room was filled with an eerie vibe due to the environment Hawkins created, no one was allowed to talk, or laugh, and she would be extremely rude and passive-aggressive to everyone's art.”
ART155A
“ if you already really good at drawing, otherwise she'll destroy your passion.”
ART210
“She definitely knows what shes looking for in your work and will help you get there. Shes very friendly and understanding, even if you're just learning.”
ART155A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize studio work and critique more than formal proctored exams.

Studio CritiqueIn-Class DrawingProject Based

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and studio conduct rather than traditional exams.

Studio CritiqueIn-Class WorkParticipation
“Even with skills Misty makes you work for every point. Don't skip class! !!”
ARTF210A
“She usually spends the entire 3 hours droning if you don't mind that though .”
ART155A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Absolute nightmare class. The room was filled with an eerie vibe due to the environment Hawkins created, no one was allowed to talk, or laugh, and she would be extremely rude and passive-aggressive to everyone's art.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 in-person , and lecture style. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Horrible! She talks on and on about nothing, never teaches technique, and is constantly treating students like we are in elementary school.”

⚖️

24/100

“I did everything&well too.Gota poor grade due to I didn't do a .”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

35/100

“ !!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She likes to hear herself
  • Constantly talks in long slow circles
  • Very long lectures in a quiet voice

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • work for
  • Does not grade on effort or overall progress

Theme 3

💬 About Classroom Climate

  • extremely rude and passive-aggressive
  • embarrassed me in front of the class
  • not someone you want to annoy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen in-person reviews span many years with and lecture complaints, though older sparse comments lower certainty.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ART155A9 reviews
ARTF210A3 reviews
ART1 review
ART1551 review
ART2101 review
Show 2 more courses
ARTF155A1 review
ARTLIFEDRAWIN1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 2