AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Jeffrey Bradley

PHIL102A · PHILOSOPHY102A · PHI100 · PHIL102B · PHIL100 · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you tolerate heavy religion debate and ; many students say avoid.

Best fit · Self Taught ProReligion-Focused LecturesCanvas Grade MismatchParticipation HeavyOpinionated Atheist AnglePolarizing Easy A
  • Class difficulty is often low, but recent students warn .
  • Lectures heavily emphasize religion, atheism, and animal rights, which splits the room.
  • Participation and weekly posts matter; and curves.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Older reviews call it an easy A with participation, but newer ones report surprise C/F outcomes and test weight traps.

Online recent reviews stress grade shocks; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Average difficulty near 2.1 with , though debates and .

Both formats describe accessible GE-level philosophy, not advanced technical content.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

and speaking up drive the grade, with tight absence limits in some terms.

Mandatory participation appears in both formats; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

Take-again rate around 40% reflects a sharp split between enlightening easy GE and miserable biased lecture experiences.

; and never-again camps.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some curves and easy pass language exist, but and .

Format shift

Online grade-transparency problems are the biggest red flag; in person reports mixed curves.

Workload

Light

58/100

Weekly posts and , yet usually completion-based and not overwhelming.

Format shift

; in person is lecture and talk heavy.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Passionate and sometimes life-changing for open-minded students, but many call him biased, rambling, or dismissive.

Format shift

In-person reviews span decades and both extremes; online recent reviews skew poor.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and a few heavily weighted tests or papers.

Format shift

Online emphasizes discussions and tests; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person and students offended by constant religion critiques, fast talking, and shut-downs.

Main concern

Opinionated religion focus and feeling talked over or dismissed in discussion.

What students said

“This class . Just show up and you will end up with an A.”
PHIL102B
“constant debate about God not existing (PLEASE STOP)”
PHIL100
“This class will change your life.”
PHIL102A

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

weekly posts, tough or weird tests, and .

Main concern

weighted scores post.

What students said

“Be aware that the grade that shows up in !”
PHIL100
“ALL SEMESTER I THOUGHT I HAD AN A, he would not change it after several emails back and fourth. ”
PHIL100
“Easy A. However, you decide if you want to learn or not.”
PHIL102A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

vague multiple-choice and opaque weighting.

Take-Home TestsMultiple ChoiceVague Test QuestionsHeavy Curve Sometimes

Assessment risk

Varies

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and ; others left students unsure what would appear on exams.

Take-Home TestsHeavy Curve Sometimes
“This class .”
PHIL102B
“There are 2 tests and !”
PHIL100
“he doesn't provide a on them.”
PHIL102A

Online

Online students report multiple-choice tests with vague items and .

Multiple ChoiceVague Test QuestionsCanvas Grade Mismatch
“the multiple choice system for class.”
PHIL102A
“ so weird and doesnt refer much in the book.”
PHIL100
“the grade that shows up in !”
PHIL100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be aware that the grade that shows up in ! He does not weigh the categories correctly.”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews (6 online, 32 in person), highlighting religion focus, participation, and grade-weight issues. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Grade Transparency

30/100

“I had a B all semester and when he put in grades on the last day I had an F?”

🗣️ Religion-Heavy Lectures

45/100

“he will immediately challenge your faith”

🟢 Easy When Engaged

70/100

“Just show up and you will end up with an A.”

👎 Recommendation Split

40/100

“ ”

Theme 1

📚 About Content Focus

  • almost exclusively talks about religion
  • bags on GOD (Jesus)A LOT
  • disprove the bible and the creation story
  • animal rights

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • Easy A

Theme 3

🎭 About Classroom Climate

  • talks very fast
  • will shut down your opinion
  • makes you think
  • self righteous type of professor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

38 reviews over many years with repeated, specific themes on religion focus, participation, and grade transparency.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 511
3 out of 56
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

PHIL10015 reviews
PHIL102A14 reviews
PHIL102B5 reviews
PHI1003 reviews
PHILOSOPHY102A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 4 · A 4

B range

7

B+ 1 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1