AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Nina Rosenstand

PHIL125 · PHIL111 · PHIL107 · 102B · PHIL102 · PHL107 · PHIL102B · PHILO102B · PHIL108 · 124 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
76.92%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

Excellent philosophy GE choice for a high grade if you do the readings and accept lecture-heavy delivery.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEasy AAmazing LecturesExtra CreditTextbook AuthorClear Criteria
  • Most students call the class easy with strong and .
  • Lectures are loved by many and called dry or condescending by a minority.
  • Online and and participation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

, and frequent make A grades common with steady work.

Both formats report easy As; online adds quizzes and and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Content is approachable for first-time philosophy students when you keep up with readings and lectures.

Online students especially call it super manageable; a .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Online is often flexible, while as mandatory.

; in-person often requires showing up.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

and easy grades despite occasional dryness complaints.

Recommendation is high in both formats, with online slightly more uniformly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Study-guide-aligned tests and .

Format shift

often than exams.

Workload

Light

72/100

Limited papers or tests and and discussions.

Format shift

Online has more discussion posts; .

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

; a minority call her boring or condescending.

Format shift

; online stresses kindness and clarity.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and rather than pure exams.

Format shift

Online leans discussions plus quizzes; and sparse papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person classes are lecture heavy with study guides, and strong praise for knowledge.

Main concern

Some students find lectures long, dry, or childlike despite easy grades.

What students said

“Out of all the professors at Mesa, Rosenstand is one of the best.”
PHIL102B
“It's an easy A if you show up and PAY ATTENTION.”
PHIL102B
“Professor Rosenstand was the most boring teacher I've ever taken.”
PHIL102B

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online sections are highly manageable with , and lots of .

Main concern

A few students find essays graded harder and the professor textbook expensive or condescending.

What students said

“This class is an easy A. Professor is very specific on what she expects.”
PHIL102B
“Very easy class, all you have to do are the 3 papers and 11 discussions.”
102B
“I took her class online and it was definitely one of the easiest classes I've taken online.”
PHIL102B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams track lectures and study guides closely, with online quizzes often open-lookup friendly.

Study Guide AlignedExtra CreditTimed Quizzes OnlineMultiple Choice and Short Answer

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lectures closely and are widely called easy if you attend.

Study GuidesIn-Class TestsTake-Home Essay Option
“ and straight off the study guide.”
102B
“ as long as .”
PHIL102B

Online

Online quizzes and and lectures, sometimes open lookup with short time limits.

Weekly QuizzesLook Up AnswersDiscussion Based
“The quizzes are a little wack with a 20 min time limit, but she lets you look up answers.”
102B
“ , and readings but mainly on the lectures.”
PHIL102B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Out of all the professors at Mesa, Rosenstand is one of the best. I have taken multiple of her courses, and ”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews across online and and lecture style. Credibility rating: High.

🅰️ Easy Grade Path

86/100

“This class is an easy A. Professor is very specific on what she expects.”

🎤 Lecture Quality

80/100

“Her lectures are actually interesting and the bit of everything.”

⭐ Recommendation Strength

82/100

“ !! .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A, just do the readings
  • Super easy, loved her!
  • Lots of

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • lectures are really long
  • very condescending

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • 3 papers and 11 discussions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

124

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across online and in-person formats show consistent easy-grade patterns with stable secondary critique themes.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 573
4 out of 526
3 out of 516
2 out of 56
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PHIL102B30 reviews
102B6 reviews
PHIL1074 reviews
PHIL1254 reviews
PHIL1082 reviews
Show 4 more courses
PHIL1021 review
PHIL1111 review
PHILO102B1 review
PHL1071 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

21

A+ 10 · A 10 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 1 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2