AI Rate Professor

History

Olivia Quintanilla

CHIC141A · CHIC141 · 141A · CHIC141B · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

older sections could be rewarding, but recent reviews urge avoiding her for grade reliability.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing experienceHeavy reading loadGrading delaysCaring when engagedParticipation heavy
  • Older reviews praise caring lectures and ; recent reviews report ghosting, late grades, and .
  • and and communication.
  • Take-again rate near 56% reflects a sharp split by era and section.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Some report easy A with discussions and quizzes; others get and heavy papers.

Online includes both easy-A and ghosting chaos; In and a recent terrible grade.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Lots of reading, papers, and discussion expectations make content time-heavy .

Both Online and In ; recent Online and In person reviews also call work outdated or chaotic.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Several sections require attendance and participation; .

In person more often mandatory; Online mixed between mandatory and optional.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

and care while .

Older Online and In ; 2023-2024 Online and In person reviews strongly discourage.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

deductions, and last-minute grading.

Format shift

Recent Online and In person reviews are harsh; older reviews in both formats sound more lenient.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Tons of reading, many papers, discussions, and quizzes dominate student complaints.

Format shift

Heavy load appears in both Online and In person comments.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

When present she is caring and passionate; recent reports of ghosting and inconsistency tank reliability.

Format shift

Online recent reviews are especially negative on communication; In person is more mixed by year.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Discussions, papers, readings, and projects outweigh traditional tests; finals sometimes shift format.

Format shift

Online notes essay finals and quizzes; In person emphasizes discussions and readings.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person praise for caring teaching and eye-opening content sits beside one harsh 2024 avoid review on outdated work and .

Main concern

, and recent tough last-minute grading.

What students said

“Professor Quintanilla is one of the and her class was very eye opening.”
CHIC141A
“ AND YOU END UP WITH A TERRIBLE GRADE.”
CHIC141B
“she is really sweet and cares a lot about her students.”
141A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews swing from easy A with , and strong avoid messages.

Main concern

, and last-minute or changed finals.

What students said

“She ghosted the class 3 weeks into the semester. on end.”
CHIC141B
“you should pass with an easy A if you do all the , and pass the quizzes”
CHIC141A
“ . .”
CHIC141B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is inconsistent across terms with quizzes, essay finals, and reports of .

Quizzes every other weekEssay finalFormat changesReading-based assessments

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews stress discussions and ; tests described as easy when given.

Discussion-basedReading heavy
“Don't worry about the tests because she is a .”
CHIC141A

Online

Online includes biweekly quizzes and .

QuizzesEssay finalChanged final format
“pass the ”
CHIC141A
“ and was supposed to be multiple choice but changed it.”
CHIC141B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews (5 Online, 4 In person), highlighting the sharp positive-to-negative shift over time. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She ghosted the class 3 weeks into the semester.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

42/100

“I .”

📚 Workload

28/100

“Just be ready to have a lot of readings”

⚖️

38/100

“SHE GRADES EVERYTHING LAST MINUTE AND YOU END UP WITH A TERRIBLE GRADE.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She genuinely cares about a student's understanding of the material
  • She really has a passion for Chicano history.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you should pass with an easy A if you do all the discussions
  • Not a .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Reliability

  • on end.
  • .
  • AVOID!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews with clear older-positive versus recent-negative split reduce consistency despite useful detail.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CHIC141B5 reviews
CHIC141A2 reviews
141A1 review
CHIC1411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values