AI Rate Professor

History

Octavio Garcia

HIST110 · HIST100 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

; if you land in his section.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnprofessionalTough graderCondescendingOpinion-driven lecturesAvoid
  • All four reviews give quality 1 with
  • Students report condescending tone, plagiarism accusations, and
  • Lectures described as

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students and poor grades for disagreeing with his opinions.

; the online review does not report a .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

High difficulty ratings and feel very hard.

Both formats rate difficulty 4-5; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Multiple reviews list mandatory attendance and .

Online and ; older in-person reviews vary.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Every review is quality 1 and students .

and in-person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

, and alleged grading against standard systems.

Format shift

Harsh grading evidence is strongest in .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

, and lecture-heavy long classes create a heavy load.

Format shift

Online notes group projects and lecture-heavy load; and essays.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students call him horrible, unprofessional, condescending, and a teacher who lectures opinions not history.

Format shift

Teaching complaints appear in both formats with identical quality 1 ratings.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Grades driven by few high-stakes essays rather than many low-stakes assignments.

Format shift

; online notes work disconnected from lectures.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students report and lying, and opinion-based history teaching.

Main concern

Strict grading against student views plus condescending classroom behavior.

What students said

“Unprofessional, accusatory, & believes his opinion is THE opinion.”
HIST110
“Grade .”
HIST100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The sole , and unrelated to assigned work.

Main concern

Long uninteresting lectures that feed ego and dismiss student answers.

What students said

“ , and uninteresting. They often have NOTHING TO DO WITH THE WORK HE ASSIGNS.”
HIST110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on strictly graded essays and opinion-aligned work rather than student-friendly tests.

Essay HeavyStrict GradingFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

little sympathy for student disagreement.

Essay OnlyExtremely Strict GradingFew Graded Things
“Grade .”
HIST100

Online

Online review ; focus is and ego-driven Q and A.

Lecture HeavyGroup Projects
“They often have NOTHING TO DO WITH THE WORK HE ASSIGNS.”
HIST110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 consistently negative reviews with rich detail. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Disaster

8/100

“Octavio Garcia is a horrible professor.”

⚖️

10/100

“Grade .”

👎 Recommendation

5/100

“ !”

😤 Classroom Climate

12/100

“Unprofessional, accusatory, & believes his opinion is THE opinion.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and uninteresting
  • He only teaches about his opinions
  • went on rants about authors, personal life

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Strict on grading that goes completely against the
  • grades you poorly if you disagree with them
  • GRADED BY FEW THINGS

Theme 3

😤 About Character

  • talks very degrading to his students
  • made fun of people's essays
  • accuses students of lying about their ethnic descent

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 reviews but they are detailed, multi-year, and fully consistent in negative tone and quality 1 scores.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

HIST1103 reviews
HIST1001 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1