AI Rate Professor

English

Jill Moreno-Ikari

ENGLISH101 · ENGLISH47A · ENG205 · ENGLISH205 · ENGLISH208 · ENG51 · ENG47A · ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENGL49 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you will write consistently and follow rubrics; avoid if you need advanced writing rigor or .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEssay HeavyTimed In-Class EssaysEnvironment ThemePolarizing GraderAttendance for Journals
  • , and sometimes very long papers or timed writes.
  • Many students call her caring and clear; others report tough or and .
  • Difficulty is often low for standard work but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students get easy As by turning work in on time, but , and .

Online reports both easy A paths and brutal timed finals; and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is often basic or high-school level for GE English, though writing volume can feel heavy.

Both formats frequently call material easy; advanced sections and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Journals and participation often require showing up; .

Online and mentioned.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Roughly half the students love her clarity and care while .

and great-professor reviews; in-person is similarly split over decades.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Often described as an if you follow the rubric, but tough-grader and .

Format shift

; in-person ranges from very easy to harsh with no .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

; some terms include 15-18 page papers.

Format shift

Online and length more common in older advanced sections.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Strong praise for helpfulness and clarity competes with critiques of , and poor support.

Format shift

Both formats show the same love-or-hate split rather than a format-specific teaching gap.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and occasional service learning rather than multiple-choice tests.

Format shift

; in-person adds journals and group activities.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person English is often described as easy and supportive, but , and .

Main concern

, and polarized views of .

What students said

“the midterm was a 15 page paper. If you come to class and work hard it's honestly not hard at all!”
ENG101
“ . No chance to make up grade because there's no .”
ENG101
“Possibly the laziest Professor I've ever met.”
ENGLISH208

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online English varies from easy discussions and four and long papers; .

Main concern

, and occasional heavy long papers create unpredictability.

What students said

“ , and two weekly discussions.”
ENGLISH101
“Brutal midterm, 18 page paper... Final was 2,000 word essay 2 hours timed.”
ENG205
“ correct so we had to figure things out on our own.”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is writing-centered with timed essays and multi-page papers; friendliness depends on paper length and timing.

Timed EssaysLong PapersJournalsDiscussionsRubric-Based

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and timed in-class writes; some terms feature very long midterms.

In-Class JournalsTimed Essays15-18 Page PapersNo Extra Credit
“ .”
ENG101
“ if you want to write an 18 page essay.”
ENGL101

Online

, and sometimes harsh timed finals or long papers.

Timed EssaysWeekly DiscussionsLong PapersRubrics
“Final was 2,000 word essay 2 hours timed, surprise topic.”
ENG205
“ , and two weekly discussions.”
ENGLISH101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do the work and put the effort in and you should get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews (6 online, 31 in and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“She is so fun and helpful. She makes English easy and understandable.”

📝 Workload Reality

48/100

“ if you want to write an 18 page essay.”

⚖️

55/100

“Honesty all I can say is she does not grade equally over all great teacher but .”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“ ! The .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and great at her profession
  • Possibly the laziest Professor I've ever met
  • she really cares about her students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She grades very easy
  • Brutal midterm, 18 page paper

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Amazing teacher and very charming
  • she look down on students who struggle

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-seven reviews spanning 2009-2024 with rich detail; opinions are polarized but sample size and consistency of themes are strong.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 59
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG10114 reviews
ENGL1018 reviews
ENG2055 reviews
ENG47A2 reviews
ENGLISH1012 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ENGLISH2082 reviews
ENG511 review
ENGL491 review
ENGLISH2051 review
ENGLISH47A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1