AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Ida Cross

CD141 · CHIL101 · CHL141 · CHILD101 · CHIL160 · CHIL141 · CHIL151 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
91.67%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take her if you want a as long as you complete the work on time.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and accessibleMakes learning funGood feedbackParticipation mattersGet ready to read
  • Students widely praise her passion, care, and .
  • Expect ; effort is required but content is approachable.
  • One recent online outlier calls her a and personality clash; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students earn As or , and projects on time, though some call her a .

Online has one harsh C and picky-post complaint; and tone are more consistently positive.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is approachable Child Development material; difficulty comes more from reading volume and .

Both formats describe manageable content if students keep up with reading and posts.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Several courses list attendance as mandatory, while , so policy is course-dependent.

Online and answers.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

About 92% would take again and most and engagement.

Strongest praise is in-person; online is still mostly positive with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, but tags and and deductions for incomplete discussion participation.

Format shift

Online reviews mention pickier post .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Expect , and heavier observation work in some practicum courses.

Format shift

Online leans discussion and papers; in-person CHIL160 adds observation hours and lesson planning.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students , and fun, with only a small minority reporting a bad personal fit.

Format shift

In-person enthusiasm is nearly uniform; online is good overall with one recent quality-1 outlier.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

, and observation work rather than high-stakes finals.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize continuous assignments; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students describe fun lectures, strong classroom management, accessibility, and real learning when you show up and do the work.

Main concern

Participation and reading load; some observation hours in practicum-style courses.

What students said

“Show up, do the work, and you will learn a lot from this class. !”
CHIL160
“I loved this Professor! So much that I swapped one of my upcoming fall classes for hers so !”
CHIL141
“only have a couple of assignments 1 child book analysis, 1 essay about 4 pages. Her lectures are fun and interesting.”
CHIL160

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections are doable with weekly discussions, papers, and reading; and .

Main concern

and occasional picky deduction on posts.

What students said

“Simple course, simple assignments. You will pass if you do all the .”
CHIL141
“ unless u absolutely have to. She's the worst!”
CHIL141
“There is a lot of reading so try not to fall behind. There are and 5 papers.”
CHIL141

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly quizzes, projects, and written work tied to reading rather than heavily proctored high-stakes exams.

Written quizzesReading-based quizzesPop chapter worksheetsProjects and papers

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention quizzes tied to reading and occasional pop chapter .

Reading-relevant quizzesPop chapter worksheets
“ reading/class material.”
CHIL141
“Be alert for pop chapter worksheet reviews.”
CHIL160

Online

Online comments describe written quizzes, discussion boards, and policy.

Written quizzesDiscussion boardsPapers
“There are 3 written quizzes, 2 projects, and discussion boards.”
CHIL141

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Show up, do the work, and you will learn a lot from this class. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews across online and in-person Child , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Professor Ida Cross has to be one of . She literally makes learning fun and exciting.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“I loved this Professor! So much that I swapped one of my upcoming fall classes for hers so !”

📝 Workload Reality

55/100

“There is a lot of reading so try not to fall behind. There are and 5 papers.”

⚖️

58/100

“She is more of a , BUT that is because she wants to make sure her students are retaining the information.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She literally makes learning fun and exciting.
  • Her .
  • Her lectures are fun and interesting.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Simple course, simple assignments. You will pass if you do all the .
  • You just really have to put in the effort.
  • Not hard!

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is thoughtful, genuine and a true gift.
  • She's a no-nonsense professor but still cares about her students.
  • She even remembered me at graduation!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

21 reviews spanning many years with rich detail and mostly consistent praise, offset only by a small online split.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHIL1607 reviews
CHIL1415 reviews
CHILD1013 reviews
CD1412 reviews
CHIL1012 reviews
Show 2 more courses
CHIL1511 review
CHL1411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values