AI Rate Professor

History

Jodye Schilz

HIST101 · HIST110 · HIST · HIST100 · HIST109 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

, and picky grading make this a high-effort low-reward experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy readingTest heavyPicky formattingDegrades students
  • Nearly all reviews warn of , and .
  • Students say she grades style rules over history content and .
  • A few older notes mention interesting lectures or , but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Students say near-perfect formatting and massive reading still yield low scores, with only rare paths via huge .

Online and ; online adds no-exam-review frustration.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Huge , and dense book critiques make the content feel punishing.

; online tests feel especially disconnected from study guides.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

; one online note marks it mandatory, but most comments focus on reading and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Nearly every detailed review says run, do not take, or refuse more classes like this.

and in-person comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Tagged tough grader repeatedly; , and margins rather than content.

Format shift

and in person.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Hours of textbook reading plus book critiques and large multi-chapter exams overwhelm even motivated students.

Format shift

Online five-week sections amplify the reading load.

Teaching experience

Poor

20/100

Students , and a degrading or uninvolved presence instead of history instruction.

Format shift

A few older in-person notes praise lectures, but most online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Courses often hinge on three huge tests plus essays or book reviews with strict specs.

Format shift

Online sections especially emphasize textbook-generated testing systems.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person and , and grading that punishes punctuation more than historical content.

Main concern

Degrading tone, two-page formatting checklists, and exams students cannot learn from.

What students said

“Must B perfect 2 get a A. I made just 4 and got a D.”
HIST109
“She does not grade on content. She grades on punctuation, margins, font sizes”
HIST101
“Tons of reading.You forget what you read by the .”
HIST100

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online sections are test-heavy with , and strict writing rules that leave students stuck at C-level outcomes.

Main concern

, and tough grading on writing specs.

What students said

“You will not learn in this class. Very strict teacher and difficult to please with your writing.”
HIST109
“The and the study guides have no correlation to the test.”
HIST100
“There is which questions are missed.”
HIST100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

review, and feel disconnected from study guides.

Test heavyNo exam reviewStudy guides uncorrelatedTough multi-chapter exams

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

critiques graded on formatting, and little instructional support.

Tough timed examsBook critique formatting rulesHeavy reading
“3 major exams are TOUGH: 100 ques, 120 mins (not nearly enough time).”
HIST100
“I made just 4 and got a D. Missed 2 commas, an underline, and a capital letter.”
HIST109

Online

and study guides that do not match exam questions.

Textbook-generated testsNo exam reviewUncorrelated study guides
“There is which questions are missed.”
HIST100
“the study guides have no correlation to the test.”
HIST100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Must B perfect 2 get a A. I made just 4 and got a D.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews (4 online, 16 in person), highlighting consistent harsh grading and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“You will not learn in this class. Very strict teacher and difficult to please with your writing.”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“ .”

⚖️

15/100

“She does not grade on content. She grades on punctuation, margins, font sizes”

📚 Workload Load

12/100

“Hours and hours and hours of reading!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This is the . In fact, she is NOTHING more than a glorified book report reader.
  • The teacher isn't involved and she tries to keep it that way.
  • very degrading w/ new students.nothing fun about class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you are comfortable with a .
  • !
  • Must B perfect 2 get a A.

Theme 3

📖

  • Tons of reading.You forget what you read by the .
  • no way to review exams to see which questions are missed
  • study guides have no correlation to the test

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty detailed reviews across 2007-2024 show , and low teaching value.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 58
1 out of 57

Course coverage

HIST1008 reviews
HIST1016 reviews
HIST1093 reviews
HIST1102 reviews
HIST1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values