AI Rate Professor

Fashion

Rachel Libolt

FASH108 · FASHBUYI · FASH115 · FASHION125 · FASH110 · FASH125 · FASH105 · FASHIONBUYING · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

expect , and strict appearance-based grading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderUnclear assignmentsExpensive projectsUnorganizedParticipation matters
  • Many students call instructions unclear and .
  • Projects and tech packs demand time and money, with costs often over $30 each.
  • A minority praise her passion, real-world stories, and when you follow Canvas closely.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

Many students still earn As and A-s, but only after fighting subjective deductions and heavy project work.

; online adds subjective outfit deductions.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

if , but vague expectations and tech packs raise the real difficulty.

In-person and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

and warn that skipping tanks your grade.

and in-person comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Official take-again sits near 30 percent, and the loudest recent .

Online reviews are almost uniformly negative; in-person is mixed but lean negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

; tiny subjective details and tech-pack file issues can zero out major assignments.

Format shift

and in person.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Repeated papers, group projects, and multi-stage tech packs create a heavy semester load.

Format shift

Online adds long VoiceThread and constant posts; in-person adds costly supply builds.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Passion and industry stories help some students, but , and weak clarification frustrate most.

Format shift

A ; online experience is consistently worse.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and presentations far more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Project-heavy pattern holds across formats.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person fashion courses mix passionate industry stories with , and expensive materials.

Main concern

Vague instructions, costly supplies, and frustration when asking for clarification.

What students said

“DO NOT TAKE CLASS WITH HER!!!! .”
FASH108
“ and . she will get angry if you ask her to clarify.”
FASH125
“Rachel Libolt is super nice and caring. and .”
FASH108

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections feel disorganized with , and .

Main concern

, and messy online group work.

What students said

“I would get points taken off for small things that were subjective.”
FASH125
“She wants us to research, teach ourselves, and , but .”
FASH105
“ . Voicethread is awful. ”
FASH125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on projects and presentations with strict appearance standards rather than classic proctored exams.

Project heavyTech packsPresentationsSubjective style grading

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and presentations more than formal exams.

Tech packsExpensive projectsPresentation focus
“Tech pack is so difficult and will put you a 0 of she can't open it”
FASH108
“ITS ALL ABOUT APPEARANCE with this class.”
FASH125

Online

Online work emphasizes VoiceThread, repetitive posts, and .

VoiceThreadGroup projectsSubjective deductions
“Online VT Lectures where long, constant posts with class became repetitive”
FASH125
“ subjective”
FASH125

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DO NOT TAKE CLASS WITH HER!!!! .”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews (4 online, 25 in , and mixed passion versus clarity. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“I wish there was a better teacher who could present this subject in an effective way.”

👍 Recommendation

34/100

“ !”

⚖️

28/100

“ .”

💸 Project Costs

30/100

“ and her book is full of typos.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a great teacher and you can tell she is passionate about her work and fashion!
  • she's terrible at getting the information out
  • her lectures were bad because she hauled through them

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , So many papers
  • she grades straight from her syllabus so no surprises there
  • I did enough for a passing grade.

Theme 3

💼

  • I spent over $30 on each
  • be prepared to spend A LOT of your own money on supplies
  • Tech pack is so difficult and will put you a 0 of she can't open it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-nine reviews from 2006-2025 provide rich detail and a consistent pattern of and .

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 513
1 out of 56

Course coverage

FASH12516 reviews
FASH1084 reviews
FASH1052 reviews
FASH1152 reviews
FASHION1252 reviews
Show 3 more courses
FASH1101 review
FASHBUYI1 review
FASHIONBUYING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 3 · A- 2

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2