AI Rate Professor

History

Maria Del Consuelo Lopez-Aramburo

MAS141 · MAS142 · MAS14180 · CHI141A · CHIC150 · HIST142 · CHI141B · CHIC141A · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
18.75%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless she is your only option and and long lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProVery disorganizedConfusing instructionsTough essay graderLecture heavyNice but hard to follow
  • and hard-to-follow lectures
  • Essay and some easy-A reports
  • A and the content manageable if you stay on top of shifting work

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some call it an easy A with light work, but and .

Online includes a strong Easy A review; in person mixes easy grades with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is not described as advanced, but , and .

Both formats stress lecture-heavy or .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

and sections where attendance is not required.

Online attendance comments vary; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Would-take-again sits near 19% and most detailed comments urge choosing any other instructor.

Negative consensus holds across online and in-person samples.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and terrible essay-grader comments outweigh the few easy-grade reports.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Work is often described as manageable or few graded items, but , and shifting due dates add stress.

Format shift

Online group projects and late-night due-date changes appear as extra friction.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students most often cite confusion, weak organization, hard-to-follow lectures, and .

Format shift

Both formats criticize teaching quality; online adds chaotic group-project logistics.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and exams, with several test-heavy tags.

Format shift

In person leans essay and test heavy; online emphasizes projects and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

clarity, boring lectures, and tough essay grading, with rare praise for niceness or easy grades.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“Shes a nice woman and all but a horrible and lectures horribly.”
CHIC141A
“The educational history. She is very disorganized, unclear”
CHIC141A
“some of and open note. i think only one is no notes.”
CHI141A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews split between one easy-A fan and , and poor organization.

Main concern

and chaotic group work.

What students said

“Terrible Professor. This is the . She lacks detail, she has a hard time with comprehension.”
CHI141B
“Easy A. Do the work (which is so easy).”
CHI141B
“she doesn't give a us to do.”
CHIC141A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

tests but also confusing or hard closed assessments.

Some take-home open-note testsLecture heavy materialEssay heavy gradingStudy guides not always reliable

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In while others are no-notes, and essays are widely called harsh.

Take-home open note testsSome no-notes examsTough essay grading
“some of and open note. i think only one is no notes.”
CHI141A
“ because they're not structured to study guides.”
CHIC141A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly document proctoring or and projects.

Group oral presentationsAssignment-focused
“You will have 2 group projects that are chaotic and have to record an oral presentation”
CHI141B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Genuinely unless and this is your only option, DO NOT TAKE THIS PROFESSOR.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting organization, grading, and recommendation themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“ and lectures horribly.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

20/100

“Just save yourself time and money and ”

⚖️

32/100

“ .”

📋 Organization

20/100

“Her assignments and due dates for are all over the place!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures horribly
  • jumps from one topic to another..
  • All she does in class is read over PowerPoint presentations

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy A. Do the work (which is so easy).
  • she gives bad grades! .

Theme 3

😕 About Organization

  • she tends to change due dates back-and-forth
  • doesn't give a us to do

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-four reviews over many years show a consistent negative pattern on organization and grading, so credibility is high despite some outliers.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 514

Course coverage

CHIC141A11 reviews
CHI141B5 reviews
HIST1422 reviews
MAS1412 reviews
CHI141A1 review
Show 3 more courses
CHIC1501 review
MAS141801 review
MAS1421 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1