AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Danika Moore

CHEM152L · CHEM201 · CHEM100 · CHEM200 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Great for intro chem if you will do the practice work; be cautious for higher-level courses if you need a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesExam heavyPractice tests match examsCaring and accessibleTough on higher chem
  • CHEM100 and , and well prepared with strong practice materials
  • CHEM200 and some 201 reports describe hard, exam-weighted courses and
  • and study even when teaching is praised

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As , but and many say one missed step can cost the problem.

Online CHEM100 felt more manageable; in-person CHEM200 drives the harder A path.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Chemistry concepts, conversions, and strong lectures.

Intro and lab reviews feel easier than CHEM200 or 201 comments.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Some sections mark attendance mandatory while others do not require it, and .

; in-person reports are mixed by course.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

About three in vocal avoid comments in harder courses.

Recommendation is strongest for CHEM100 and labs versus some CHEM200 or 201 experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Clear criteria and , but and partial-credit complaints are common in higher chem.

Format shift

Tough grading language clusters in in-person CHEM200 reviews.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Homework and practice packs are frequent and helpful; higher courses add lots of homework and .

Format shift

Online weekly HW or .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and caring with strong office-hour support, though a minority say she cannot teach higher chem well.

Format shift

Positive teaching consensus is strongest in person for CHEM100 and labs.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Students repeatedly note exams around 80 percent of the .

Format shift

; online also notes weekly quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person she is widely praised for clarity and care in CHEM100 and labs, while CHEM200 , and .

Main concern

Exam-heavy structure and .

What students said

“The ! I took this class before and I wish I met Danica sooner.”
CHEM100
“ she gives”
CHEM200
“Very hard class. If you want to succeed I suggest you start doing the .”
CHEM200

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One online CHEM100 student loved and , and a comprehensive final with lowest dropped.

Main concern

Chemistry concepts and conversion math still demand steady effort.

What students said

“she does weekly homework, almost weekly quizzes, 3 tests and ”
CHEM100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and can feel tricky or hard, though practice materials often mirror the real tests.

Practice exams match testsExam heavyCalculator clearing mentionedTake-home quizzes sometimes

Assessment risk

Standard

46/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, practice tests often match exams; some note graphing calculators are checked and cleared, and .

Practice tests mirror examsCalculator clearedTake-home quizzesHigh exam weight
“ she gives”
CHEM200
“if you have a graphing calculator she checks them and clears them!”
CHEM200
“She gives out take home quiz which has similar questions on her exam but the and trickier.”
CHEM200

Online

Online review describes three tests and a comprehensive final with the lowest dropped, plus scratch-paper integrity checks in a related transition note.

Three tests plus comprehensive finalLowest exam droppedWeekly quizzes
“she does weekly homework, almost weekly quizzes, 3 tests and ”
CHEM100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The ! I took this class before and I wish I met Danica sooner. She makes the class understandable and cares for you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting teaching, exam weight, and course-level differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She makes the class understandable and cares for you.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

74/100

“ if you have a chance. Her classes fill up quick!”

📝

70/100

“ she gives”

⚠️ Harder Chem Risk

35/100

“Very hard class. If you want to succeed I suggest you start doing the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • really good at breaking down concepts
  • prerecorded lectures are great
  • super personable and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Doing the
  • exams are 80% of the grade

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • cares about her students
  • hilarious
  • real gem

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

, and general chem levels show a coherent pattern with and workload.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CHEM20012 reviews
CHEM1005 reviews
CHEM152L4 reviews
CHEM2011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 6

B range

8

B+ 2 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1