AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Kimberly Mills

RADT256B · RADT101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can self-advocate hard and accept high program politics risk.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHolds Students AccountableTextbook-HeavyClinical Site RiskMixed FairnessProgram Director Concerns
  • One , and genuine support for success.
  • Another details zero clinical protection and no due process as program director.
  • Experience splits hard between classroom fairness and program-level risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student earned an A with and , but the other withdrew amid program conflict.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty sits mid-range with heavy textbook reading and accountability for your own learning.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Both reviews report attendance as mandatory.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; the other would not due to clinical and due-process issues.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

as relatively fair with , but program-level write-ups feel arbitrary.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person only.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Heavy textbook use and chapter reviews feed exams; not portrayed as light.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Supportive straight-to-the-point teaching clashes with harsh program-director complaints.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person only.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

accountability for learning.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Classroom side can feel fair and , but program director role draws sharp criticism over clinical write-ups and lack of student protection.

Main concern

Clinical site conflict can trigger write-ups with little internal due process.

What students said

“She is a straight to the . She will hold you accountable for your own learning and is relatively fair with grades and class expectations.”
RADT101
“She will not protect students at the clinical site. If the student offends any technologists, the student will get written up, even for reasons "sky being blue".”
RADT256B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

otherwise standard expectations.

Textbook-based examsChapter review questions

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Chapter review questions from the textbook show up on exams.

Textbook-based examsChapter review questions
“She uses the textbook heavily and the chapter review questions will show up on the exam.”
RADT101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She will not protect students at the clinical site. If the student offends any technologists, the student will get written up, even for reasons "sky being blue".”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews with strongly conflicting tones. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️ Fair Classroom Expectations

70/100

“She will hold you accountable for your own learning and is relatively fair with grades and class expectations.”

🚨 Clinical Protection Risk

15/100

“There is no "due process" within the program.”

📚 Textbook-Centered Exams

60/100

“She uses the textbook heavily and the chapter review questions will show up on the exam.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a straight to the .
  • She wants you to succeed and expresses that through words and actions.
  • Don't be intimidated!

Theme 2

⚠️ About Program Risk

  • She will not protect students at the clinical site.
  • There is no "due process" within the program.
  • Student have to use process within the college and district.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting reviews spanning 2021-2023 with limited detail consistency.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

RADT1011 review
RADT256B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1