AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Marianne Gibson

WEB162 · WEBD168 · WEBD166 · WEBD162 · WEBD153 · WEB166 · CS152 · CIS152 · 48 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
96.67%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

and SQL professor if , and strong learning payoff.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAmazing video lecturesGives great feedbackCaring and accessibleClear weekly structureBeginner-friendly web/SQL
  • Students rave about step-by-step video tutorials and .
  • As long as you follow prompts and do weekly work, high grades are common.
  • A few notes cite outdated software clips or strict no-resubmit policy, but praise dominates.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

81/100

Most students earn A or A+ , and following instructions.

Both formats report high grades; one online student felt unforgiving on a failed resubmit.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, but coding detail and weekly volume still require focus.

Online and ; some advanced sections feel deeper.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

, yet many online students succeed by staying on schedule remotely.

Online weekly cadence is clear; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

and SQL beginners.

Strong recommendation appears in both online and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

and ; a minority call her unforgiving.

Format shift

Fairness praise is common in both formats; the .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Expect weekly quizzes, discussions, coding practice, and .

Format shift

Both online and ; deeper courses feel heavier.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Students , and clear explanations.

Format shift

Excellence holds across online and in-person evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Weekly quizzes, homework, discussions, and final.

Format shift

Same assignment-heavy pattern appears online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person and hybrid-style comments , and excellent feedback on coding work.

Main concern

There can be a , so stay current weekly.

What students said

“Great teacher. Very knowledgeable. Gives step by step directions in her lecture videos.”
WEBD168
“ if learning something to apply isyour primary goal.”
WEBD162
“Professor Gibson is an , and thorough instructor in this relatively complex subject.”
WEB166

Remote format

Online

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and weekly quizzes plus projects.

Main concern

Some videos feel outdated or error-prone, and a rare student felt dropped without a second chance.

What students said

“Her video tutorials , and can even help with tips on difficult topics like Bootstrap.”
WEBD168
“She's the best. and have fun while doing it.”
WEBD153
“ .”
WEB166

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on weekly quizzes and proctored finals.

Weekly quizzesHomework and projectsVideo-supported assignmentsQuizzes reattemptable (reported)

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and feedback more than proctored exam rules.

Assignments and feedbackClear grading criteriaHomework-focused
“Attend class and do the assignments. The and .”
WEB162

Online

, and projects; one review says weekly quizzes can be reattempted.

Weekly quizzesHomework and final projectReattemptable quizzes (one review)Video tutorials
“Basically, just read the text, watch the video tutorials, do a short quiz , 3 discussions and do a .”
WEB162
“The and Prof. Gibson has an online video that accompanies each assignment.”
WEBD153

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Gibson is easily my favorite teacher from my entire college experience- she really cares about her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 49 reviews (30 online, 19 in person), highlighting tutorials, support, and grade fairness. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“She has a talent for making it easy to understand and delivering effective learning material.”

👍

96/100

“If .”

🎥 Video Support

92/100

“Gives step by step directions in her lecture videos. .”

💌 Accessibility

90/100

“She took the time to spend over 2 hrs on a video chat to help and guide me in the right direction.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • video tutorials are straightforward
  • lessons are fun and her lectures and videos are amazing
  • teaching methods should be a model for all professors

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do the homework. Read the prompts carefully, and you will do very well
  • be prepared to read and practice you coding skills
  • challenging but fair

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • really cares about her students
  • gives awesome feedbacks
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

49

Recent reviews read by the AI

48

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-nine detailed reviews across many years and both formats show highly consistent praise with only rare outliers.

Inside 49 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 543
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

WEBD15316 reviews
WEBD16211 reviews
WEB1627 reviews
WEB1666 reviews
WEBD1684 reviews
Show 3 more courses
CIS1523 reviews
CS1521 review
WEBD1661 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

35

A+ 15 · A 18 · A- 2

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1