AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Mona Hanna

CHE200 · CHM200L · CHEMLAB · CHEM152 · 200L · CHEM200L · CHEM200 · CHEM152L · LAB · 49 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
77.27%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Great chem lab pick if you follow her format exactly and never miss or arrive late.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring lab instructorStrict attendancePrelab requiredOften no lab examAccent takes adjustment
  • Most students say show up prepared, finish labs, and an A is realistic.
  • She is caring and funny, but a thick accent and picky lab formatting trip some people up.
  • Attendance and on-time prelabs are non-negotiable; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

79/100

Many say finishing labs on her format and attending yields an A, though picky deductions exist.

; the one online review does not support an easy A.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Lab work is manageable when prepped, with difficulty mostly from format precision rather than concepts.

Nearly all ease evidence is in person; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Skipping or and key prelab instruction.

Mandatory tone is consistent in person; as not mandatory but still poorly received.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students strongly recommend her lab despite accent and strictness complaints.

In-person recommendation is high; the lone online review says no.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Many call her fair or easy if work matches her template; tough-grader and picky comments are also common.

Format shift

In-person fairness dominates long-term; online and a few recent reviews feel harsher.

Workload

Moderate

54/100

Prelabs, data sheets, and careful write-ups add steady work without usually feeling overwhelming.

Format shift

Workload notes are mostly in person around prelabs and lab packets.

Teaching experience

Good

81/100

Students praise care, humor, and prelab explanations, tempered by accent and occasional attitude issues.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is robust; online instruction was called messy.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades mainly come from prelabs and lab reports, often with a dropped lab and limited exams.

Format shift

In person frequently reports no lab exam; and final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person labs are widely praised as fair, structured, and A-friendly when you complete prelabs and attend every session.

Main concern

Strict lateness rules, accent comprehension, and picky point deductions on lab write-ups.

What students said

“Do all was is asked and it'll be an easy A!! .”
CHEM200L
“AND THERE IS NO LAB EXAM. and so well.”
CHEM200L
“DO NOT MISS LAB OR COME and you will miss her prelab lecture”
CHEM152L

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative about unclear lab explanations and .

Main concern

Online students may get grading talk instead of .

What students said

“Does not explain the lab well. Spends time explaining how she grades instead of explaining the experiment, what we looking for, etc ...”
200L

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Many sections grade mostly on labs with a dropped low score and little or no lab exam.

Often no lab examDrop lowest labPrelab and data sheetsNote cards allowed (older reports)Midterm and final in some terms

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students often report no lab exam, dropped lowest lab, prelabs required, and .

No lab exam (many reports)Drop lowest labPrelab requiredMidterm and final (some terms)Note cards allowed (older reports)
“AND THERE IS NO LAB EXAM. and so well.”
CHEM200L
“ and . she gives very good detailed information before lab.”
CHEM152L
“ . Drops lowest lab grade. Do all the work and you will get an A.”
CHEM152L

Online

Single online review focuses on unclear labs and .

Picky gradingUnclear lab explanation
“Does not explain the lab well. Spends time explaining how she grades instead of explaining the experiment, what we looking for, etc ...”
200L

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is by far the . You have 13 experiments, your lowest is dropped, AND THERE IS NO LAB EXAM.”

Voice snapshots generated from 49 reviews (1 online, 48 in person), highlighting lab policy, attendance, and grade paths. Credibility rating: High.

🧪 Lab Structure

81/100

“Always be prepare before lab, do the pre-lab (You can't turn in the Pre-Lab late!!)”

🎯 Easy A Path

79/100

“Do all was is asked and it'll be an easy A!! .”

⏰

18/100

“DO NOT MISS LAB OR COME ”

❤️ Caring Support

85/100

“ and so well. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • caring and funny sometimes
  • so well
  • thick accent so i had to pay attention

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy A just finish the lab questions
  • though so you have to turn in
  • Getting an A is as easy as show up and be able to competently complete the experiments

Theme 3

📋 About Lab Policy

  • AND THERE IS NO LAB EXAM
  • You can't turn in the Pre-Lab late!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

49

Recent reviews read by the AI

49

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-nine reviews over many years with rich lab-policy detail make the ; online evidence is thin.

Inside 49 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 533
4 out of 59
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM200L25 reviews
CHEM152L11 reviews
200L4 reviews
CHEM2004 reviews
CHE2001 review
Show 4 more courses
CHEM1521 review
CHEMLAB1 review
CHM200L1 review
LAB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 5 · A 13 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1