AI Rate Professor

Medicine

Jimmi Huynh

MEDA110 · MEDA55 · MED055 · MEDTERMS110 · MED11041258 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Prefer his online sections if you can keep up with and reading; .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra Credit WeeklyTest HeavyGet Ready to ReadCaring MotivatorPolarizing In Person
  • Online students , and fair support.
  • trick-question heavy.
  • Weekly exams and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

and if you study weekly; skipping work tanks the grade fast.

Online reviewers report easy As with EC; and trick questions.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Heavy memorization and weekly term volume make content standard-to-challenging despite manageable difficulty averages.

Online often feels easier; and stricter lecture dynamics.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and warn that skipping class hurts, especially in person.

Online attendance is mixed or flexible; and you will not pass.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

65/100

About three in by sharp in-person criticism.

Online is consistently recommended; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Clear criteria and frequent help, though some call him a .

Format shift

Online leans fair with EC; and trick-question complaints.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Weekly 100-question exams, heavy reading, and .

Format shift

; online adds virtual labs and weekly quizzes.

Teaching experience

Average

66/100

Many find him caring and motivating, while a and poor interpersonal tone.

Format shift

Online teaching reputation is strong; in-person quality is polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Weekly multiple-choice , and homework.

Format shift

Both formats are test-heavy; online also uses Kahoot EC and virtual labs.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some call him fair and motivating, others urge switching professors over attitude, trick questions, and weak lectures.

Main concern

Several students report , and tough closed-book style tests.

What students said

“I would strongly so with another professor.”
MEDA110
“If you're planning to take Medical terminology 110 at Mesa . Huynh.”
MEDA110

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

engaging, lots of , Kahoot practice, fair grading, and doable if you stay on schedule.

Main concern

Weekly exams and dense terminology still feel like a fire hose without time management.

What students said

“Easiest online course Ive taken, his lectures make good study guide.”
MEDA110
“Very caring professor. Textbook was great, lots of reading.”
MEDA55

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; friendliness is higher online than in older in-person reports.

Weekly Exams100 Multiple ChoiceKahoot PracticeExtra CreditClosed-Book Final Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and detailed; some report trick questions and a cumulative closed-book final with no notes.

Weekly 100-Question ExamsTrick Questions ReportedClosed-Book FinalNo Notes
“there are 100 multiple choice exams every week”
MEDA110
“The notes, and I'm sure filled with more trick questions.”
MEDTERMS110

Online

Online students describe weekly exams and and .

Weekly ExamsKahoot PracticeExtra Credit
“weekly exams with 50 multiple choice.”
MEDA55
“Gives weekly and uses Kahoots to let you practice for exams.”
MEDA110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're planning to take Medical terminology 110 at Mesa . Huynh.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting online-positive vs in-person-polarized themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Online Praise

85/100

“Easiest online course Ive taken, his lectures make good study guide.”

⚠️ Polarized In Person

35/100

“I would strongly so with another professor.”

⭐ Engine

75/100

“Don't forget the extra credits there will be alot of them each week!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very caring professor
  • he's a good motivator for online classes
  • He is a tough professor, but he will work with you

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's an easy class if you do the work
  • When he says everything you read on the
  • Trick

Theme 3

📚

  • Get ready to read
  • Some weeks felt like drinking out of a fire hose
  • A lot of and very detailed

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty detailed reviews across online and in-person formats from 2017-2025 show a .

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MEDA11012 reviews
MEDA555 reviews
MED0551 review
MED110412581 review
MEDTERMS1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 4 · A 4

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2