AI Rate Professor

English

Celia Orona

ENGESOL · ESOLESOL · ENGLI40 · SDCC1 · ESOL31 · ESOL040 · SDDC1 · ESOL40 · ENG101 · HUMANITIES · ENG040 · ENG30 · HUM · SDCC4 · ENG42 · ENGH40 · ENG51 · ELC25 · ENG105 · ESL41 · ESL40 · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if you can; students overwhelmingly say you learn little and risk unfair grades.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRude and harshDoes not teach clearlyHeavy papers and homeworkConfusing gradingHigh dropout vibe
  • The vast majority of , and ineffective at teaching English or ESL.
  • Workload centers on papers, group work, and .
  • A few outliers say she is strict but useful training, but they .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Students repeatedly say grades are unfair, unexplained, and many fail even after heavy effort.

Both online and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The and more from unclear instruction, volume of work, and punitive grading.

Online weekly essay and discussion volume is intense; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and skipping means you will not pass.

and in-person comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Most students and describe wasted time, no learning, and hostile treatment.

; only a few outliers recommend the hard training.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

Students say she looks only for mistakes, fails many classmates, and .

Format shift

and in person.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

, and lots of group work create heavy load.

Format shift

Online weekly discussion and reading load is especially heavy.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Dominant theme is that she does not teach, confuses students, and creates a rude classroom climate.

Format shift

; online has one positive among three.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Discussion posts, papers, group work, and .

Format shift

Online comments emphasize discussion posts over quizzes; and group work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ESL and English reviews are overwhelmingly negative, citing rudeness, no real teaching, group-work fillers, and failing large portions of class.

Main concern

Mean classroom climate and little instruction while still assigning harsh work.

What students said

“She is the life. She is so so mean person, make you embarrassing front of the class”
ESL41
“ . . She 's so rude. ... she didn't teach and she fail most of the class”
ESOL40
“If ”
SDCC4

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online ENG101 is described as , and high attrition, with one positive holdout.

Main concern

Unexplained grades, rude tone, and and discussion load.

What students said

“DO NOT TAKE THIS COURSE WITH THIS PROFESSOR!! ... .”
ENG101
“My class started off with 27 people and the semester ended with only 8 students left in the class.”
ENG101
“She is hard, but .”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment feels strict and punitive, with timed essays and quizzes that students say are poorly supported by instruction.

Essay timed writingQuizzes on readingsUnclear grading criteria

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments mention timed full essays and tests, but .

Timed essay writingHarsh paper grading
“she wants you to write a . !”
ESOL40

Online

Online work emphasizes weekly discussion posts, essay readings, and .

Discussion posts worth more than quizzesWeekly essay quizzes
“This is a class where the ... read up to 3 essays every week and take quizzes on those essays.”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DO NOT TAKE THIS COURSE WITH THIS PROFESSOR!! ... .”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews dominated by ESL and English courses. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Warning

16/100

“Hey freshmen! Here is the most useful advice for passing SDCC: ”

📉 Teaching Quality

15/100

“There's no instruction from her. She can't manage the time and that make us rush.”

😠 Classroom Climate

18/100

“She is so so mean person, make you embarrassing front of the class for something so worthless”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she didn't teach at all
  • Far from learning, she confuses her students
  • she only rambles on about stuff

Theme 2

📝 About Workload & Grades

  • many paper and she is anti technology
  • she fail most of the class

Theme 3

💔 About Character

  • She is so rude
  • we called her witch. so rude too
  • She was so rude. She never explained anything

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-eight reviews over many years are highly consistent in negative teaching and .

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 56
1 out of 526

Course coverage

ESOL409 reviews
ENG1015 reviews
SDCC43 reviews
ENG1052 reviews
ESL412 reviews
Show 16 more courses
SDCC12 reviews
ELC251 review
ENG0401 review
ENG301 review
ENG421 review
ENG511 review
ENGESOL1 review
ENGH401 review
ENGLI401 review
ESL401 review
ESOL0401 review
ESOL311 review
ESOLESOL1 review
HUM1 review
HUMANITIES1 review
SDDC11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1