AI Rate Professor

Medicine

Danielle Lauria

MEDAMEDA · MEDA110 · MEDA115 · MEDICALTERM · MEDA105 · MEDA205 · MEDA150 · MEDA112 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want a demanding medical assisting course and and zero flexibility.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizingTough GraderTest HeavyEngaging StoriesNo Late Work
  • Older reviews praise fun, story-driven lectures; , and poor help.
  • Attendance and deadlines are strict with zeros for misses and little .
  • a preference.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

, and grades like C and C- show an A takes careful, on-time work with little cushion.

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Long chapters, dense medical terms, and and pacing demanding.

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and note you will not pass if .

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Stated would-take-again is about 20 percent, with .

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

, and reports of .

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of , and test-heavy assessment add up quickly.

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

older students love her energy and stories; newer ones say she only reads slides and is rude or unhelpful.

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

TEST HEAVY tags and comments about tricky exams and long chapters for tests dominate.

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

many older students call her one of , while newer reviewers , and harsh policies.

Main concern

, and zero tolerance for late or missed work.

What students said

“All she did was read off the powerpoints and gave no help in direction with the terms for the test”
MEDA110
“If you confuse a date or miss ANYTHING, you get a zero. No late work. No make ups. No .”
MEDA110
“Professor Lauria is the .”
MEDICALTERM

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as tricky and high-stakes, with at least one report that answers did not match the key.

Tricky ExamsTest HeavyAnswer Key Concerns

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviewers report tricky exams and ; one student doubted the exam and aligned.

Tricky ExamsTest Heavy
“ . Still missed the .”
MEDA115
“TEST HEAVY”
MEDA110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you confuse a date or miss ANYTHING, you get a zero. No late work. No make ups. No .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 In person reviews spanning 2007-2022 with polarized eras; Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️ Harsh Policies

24/100

“If you confuse a date or miss ANYTHING, you get a zero. No late work. No make ups. No .”

📚 Polarized Teaching

55/100

“Professor Lauria is the .”

🧪 Tricky Exams

28/100

“ . Still missed the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes long classes interesting, and helps you to learn by association.
  • All she did was read off the powerpoints and gave no help

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • it's an easy A if everything is turned in on time.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she is very rude!
  • She is an amazing teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews over many years with rich detail, but strong era split (glowing older vs critical newer) lowers consistency.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MEDA1103 reviews
MEDAMEDA3 reviews
MEDA1052 reviews
MEDA1122 reviews
MEDA1151 review
Show 3 more courses
MEDA1501 review
MEDA2051 review
MEDICALTERM1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1