AI Rate Professor

History

Proceso Paligutan

HIST109 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid if ; pick a longer term and self-organize heavily if stuck with him.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesTest heavyGet ready to readLecture heavyHard to take notes
  • Students learn content but struggle with poor lecture structure
  • Slides lack outlines and detail, making note-taking frustrating
  • Test and ;

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

A B- with high reading and .

Online reports B-; In person gives no grade but same tough tone.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Difficulty ratings are mid-high with and poorly structured lectures.

Both Online and In person describe structural friction that raises challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

.

and In person.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Low quality , and structure complaints dominate.

Negative tone is consistent across Online and In person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

; one B- and test-heavy design suggest average-to-strict outcomes.

Format shift

Limited grade data; similar pressure Online and In person.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Get ready to read plus lecture-heavy and .

Format shift

Both formats flag reading and tests as the burden.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Students learn some content but lectures and and thin.

Format shift

Structure complaints appear in both Online and In person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Test-heavy and .

Format shift

In person explicitly tags test heavy; Online also lecture-based assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Eight-week HIST109 feels rushed with weak slides and ; .

Main concern

Short and test-heavy design.

What students said

“I would recommend taking the 16-week instead if you ever get this professor”
HIST109

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Content is solid but lectures lack organization for note-taking, forcing students to write everything down.

Main concern

Poor lecture structure makes note-taking very frustrating.

What students said

“the ”
HIST109

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and tests largely track lectures that students call poorly made.

Quiz from lecturesTest heavyLecture based

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Quizzes mostly come from lectures; slides lack detail. .

Quiz from lecturesTest heavy
“ lectures, that aren't well made”
HIST109

Online

Assessment leans on lectures that ; .

Lecture-based assessment
“Much is based off of the lectures but the ”
HIST109

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“there was much lacking when it came to structure. Much is based off of the lectures but the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 Online, 1 In person), highlighting structure problems and test load. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

30/100

“the ”

📝 Assessment Load

35/100

“ lectures, that aren't well made”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“I would recommend taking the 16-week instead if you ever get this professor”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • don't have much detail put into the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Structure

  • I learned a lot from the content presented
  • I found myself just writing everything down which was very frustrating
  • recommend taking the 16-week instead

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only two recent reviews (one Online, one In person) with consistent negatives but thin sample size.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST1092 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values