AI Rate Professor

Nutrition

Carrie Johnson

NUT101 · NUTR150 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Fine if and email patiently; avoid if you need fast responses or .

Best fit · Self Taught ProClear grading criteriaGives good feedbackLots of homeworkSlow communication onlineLecture heavy
  • Online experiences range from easy and .
  • In person, lectures can feel long while .
  • and real learning in nutrition content.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Several call it easy if you try, yet homework volume and .

Online leans easier for self-starters; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Nutrition content is manageable but benefits from biology/chemistry background and .

Online homework feels simple; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Some sections mark attendance mandatory; .

Online often flexible; at least one in-person NUT101 required attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

About 60% would take again; positives cite help and clarity, negatives cite boredom and unreachable email.

Online reviews split hard; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Clear criteria and ; and 20% late penalty appear online.

Format shift

Online late-work rules and delays contrast with .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Lots of homework, quizzes, projects, and .

Format shift

Online ebook/Blackboard volume is high; and exams.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Some call her amazing and clear; others find lectures boring and communication slow.

Format shift

Online communication quality varies by semester; .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and several exams.

Format shift

In-person NUT101 lists project, 21 quizzes, 5 exams; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and clear criteria with boring long lectures and vague study guides.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Carrie Johnson is an amazing professor. She is there for you and answers your questions so that you fully understand.”
NUT101
“The lectures were long and boring. so we resulted in studying from the textbook.”
NUTR150

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online NUTR/NUT courses swing from easy Blackboard homework with quick help and .

Main concern

Slow communication and .

What students said

“Easy online class, required to buy an ebook, lots of homework and and ebook but they are simple and direct to the point.”
NUTR150
“the teacher is nearly impossible to communicate with, she works another job and is always there.”
NUTR150
“Honestly, it's easy if you try.”
NUT101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are not extreme but study guides can be broad; and .

Multiple examsQuizzesDiet analysis projectTextbook-based study

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Exams are moderate but vague study guides force textbook study; quizzes and a diet project also count.

5 exams21 short quizzesDiet Analysis project
“Graded work includes, a project-- Diet Analysis, 21 short Quizzes, and 5 exams.”
NUT101
“ but studying for them was hard since we never knew what was going to be on it.”
NUTR150

Online

Reviews mention tests and lots of ; proctoring tools are not clearly described.

TEST HEAVYLots of homeworkClear grading criteria
“Honestly, it's easy if you try.”
NUT101
“lots of homework and and ebook but they are simple and direct to the point.”
NUTR150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy online class... Answers emails quickly and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (3 online, 2 in-person), balancing easy-course praise against communication and lecture complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

📬 Communication Split

35/100

“the teacher is nearly impossible to communicate with, she works another job and is always there.”

✅

80/100

“Answers emails quickly and .”

📚 Workload Reality

45/100

“lots of homework and and ebook but they are simple and direct to the point.”

🧪 Learning Payoff

75/100

“You will learn a lot!! Graded work includes, a project-- Diet Analysis, 21 short Quizzes, and 5 exams.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Caring and answers questions so you understand
  • Lectures can be long and slides thin

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy if you try online
  • Lots of homework and quizzes
  • Exams fair but study guides broad

Theme 3

💻 About Online vs In Person

  • ebook required and Blackboard volume
  • textbook study fills lecture gaps

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across online and in-person from 2018-2022 give useful but small-sample, mixed signals.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

NUTR1503 reviews
NUT1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1