AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Yawo Ezunkpe

ME200 · MATH121 · MATH151 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
36.36%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you are a and mismatched exams.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerBehind-schedule riskTests mismatch lecturesExtra credit cushionAccent comprehension hurdleHardcore calc only
  • Online MATH121 reviews are strongly negative on clarity, fairness, and .
  • In-person MATH151 is mixed: and knowledgeable, others cite chaos and mismatched tests.
  • and redos help survivors, but Calc 2 still demands heavy self-study.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

and redos exist, but many fail or struggle because and the course stays behind.

Online MATH121 looks nearly impossible for beginners; in-person offers more EC and redos but still hard.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Calc 2 and related courses are repeatedly called hard with and .

Online and ; online adds communication breakdowns.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Some sections mark attendance optional and .

; in-person answers are split.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Would-take-again sits near one-third, with and would not take again comments outweighing strong endorsements.

Both online reviews say no; yes votes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Tons of , and redos help grades, and many still fail.

Format shift

In-person has more EC and redo mentions; online offers little relief.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Lots of , and self-teaching load when lectures lag.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy work; .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Knowledgeable and sometimes caring, but frequent reports of confusion, tangents, accent barriers, and poor communication.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is especially poor; in-person is polarizing.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Test-heavy with ; and redos.

Format shift

Online finals described as ; and homework mismatch.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person MATH151 and ME200 reviews split between caring hardcore-learning praise and complaints about being weeks behind, accent barriers, and mismatched tests.

Main concern

Chronic schedule lag and .

What students said

“he is a very caring professor and will stay for a while to make sure you understand the mateial.”
MATH151
“Always behind on whats posted on the syllabus. No pre-tests and .”
MATH151
“Terrible communicator, today and he changed the date to three days from now.”
ME200

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Both online MATH121 reviews urge not to , and exams that fail students.

Main concern

and the class was widely failing.

What students said

“ . His lectures are so boring and confusing.”
MATH121
“ . The homework doesn't match the lectures.”
MATH121

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often harder or misaligned with lectures and .

Tests mismatch lecturesHarder retake finalTimed one-hour window midtermTake-home exams and redos sometimes

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and timed windows; and redos offset mismatch complaints.

Timed midterm windowsHomework-exam mismatchTake-home exams and redos
“It must be taken during a one hour window, giving students no time to change work schedules.”
ME200
“ and redos for us to get better grades.”
MATH151
“ .”
MATH151

Online

Students report power-outage forced a and tests that do not match lectures or homework.

Harder final retakeTests mismatch lectures and homework
“ because I had a power outage during an exam.”
MATH121
“ .”
MATH121

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . His lectures are so boring and confusing. His accent makes him hard to understand and oftentimes his emails don't make sense.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews (2 online, 9 in person), contrasting online disasters with . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Online Warning

15/100

“ . His lectures are so boring and confusing.”

❤️

75/100

“he is a very caring professor and will stay for a while to make sure you understand the mateial.”

📅 Always Behind Schedule

30/100

“Always behind on whats posted on the syllabus.”

🎁 Lifeline

60/100

“He offered tons of extra credits and willing to help if you have questions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His accent makes him hard to understand
  • Went off in a lot of tangents
  • Extremely knowledgeable and resourceful since he also does engineering

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Everyone in my class was failing
  • Calc 2 itself is not easy so be prepared to work hard if you want to pass the class
  • I just paid to calculus

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • Would test you on things you learned 2 weeks prior
  • and redos for us to get better grades

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven recent-ish reviews with sharp online versus in-person contrast and consistent schedule and .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1518 reviews
MATH1212 reviews
ME2001 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1